Charities/NFP - Parry Field Lawyers

We have helped many incorporated societies transition into charitable trusts and an issue that always arises is what happens to bequests to the incorporated society? The answer, in short, is “it depends”. This article will look at two situations; what happens to bequests when the incorporated society is wound up and what happens when the incorporated society is left as a shell entity.

Wound up incorporated society

Firstly, if a gift is left to an incorporated society that has been wound up, the executer would look to supporting documents that show a relationship with the trust and whether it is essentially the same entity. This would include, for example, the background section of the trust deed and the resolution to wind up and transfer assets from the society to the charitable trust.

The court may need to get involved if the executer is not satisfied the charitable trust is essentially the same as the incorporated society or where the wording of the Will is clear that the funds are only to go to the society. In this unlikely case, the court will seek to carry out the wishes of the Will-Maker when deciding which charitable entity to gift the funds to.

This means that even where there is a background section in the trust deed, there is no absolute certainty that the charitable trust will receive a bequest meant for the society. It is likely they will, due to the clear documentation that the charitable trust is essentially the same as the society, but there still remains a risk. Unfortunately, we have talked to MBIE about this and they cannot make any regulations for the new Act to remove this risk.

It is therefore advisable that if your incorporated society has transferred to a charitable trust, that you get in touch with your supporters and let them know they should amend their Wills. If you need help with this wording please do not hesitate to contact one of our experts here at Parry Field Lawyers.

Shell incorporated society entity

Secondly, whether bequests are paid to the charitable trust when the Will states it is to an incorporated society and/or quotes the charitable trust depends on what the Will says, how the executor feels about the bequests and if the residuary or other beneficiaries will raise issues.

Where a Will is clear that the bequest is for the incorporated society and it contains the Companies Office number or Charities Service number, the executor will generally be able to find the contact details for the society. It could then be explained to the executor that the charitable trust is undertaking the same work as the incorporated society. It will be at the executor’s discretion as to whether they transfer the funds to the charitable trust directly or require the funds to be transferred to the incorporated society. It would be prudent for the incorporated society to keep a bank account and to be active for this very reason, so it can transfer any bequests made to it.

The executor may be a close relative (e.g. child) of the Will-Maker who is aware of the Will-Maker’s wishes and can interpret the gift left in the Will to the society as being meant for the charitable trust. By contrast, the executor might be distanced from the Will-Maker or unaware of their involvement in the charitable trust and therefore unwilling to make the gift to the society.

A situation may arise where a beneficiary of the Will is challenging the gift made to the society, in which case it could be helpful to avoid any challenges to the validity of the gift itself.

These may be a reason to keep the society as a shell entity, to avoid a lot of these situations. It is prudent to consider how long you should leave the incorporated society as a shell for, as there may be some people who have drafted their Wills recently but won’t pass for a long time.

Some Wills contain a clause which discusses the “successor” entity which that would work in the charitable trust’s favour. Alternatively, some Wills say that if a gift fails then it gets added to the residue, or if the provision falls short, then it automatically gets added to the residue, this would not be in the charitable trust’s favour.

—

We have helped many incorporated societies transition to a charitable trust and have an incorporated society information hub here and a charitable trust information hub here. This article is not a substitute for legal advice and our experts here at Parry Field Lawyers would be happy to answer any of your questions.

If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team on stevenmoe@parryfield.com sophietremewan@parryfield.com or annemariemora@parryfield.com .

Many organisations choose to hire out their venues to the public when the venues are otherwise unused. While this can be an excellent way of bringing in funds, there are some pitfalls to be aware of including intentional or unintentional discrimination.

Discrimination on the basis of religion

In 2012, a Catholic Priest in the United Kingdom sought to ban its church hall being used for ‘spiritual yoga’, [1] which was thought to be incompatible with the Catholic faith. Even if the yoga was incompatible, excluding the yoga teacher on the basis of religion would be illegal in New Zealand and grounds for a complaint of discrimination.

It may seem counter-intuitive that one religion cannot prevent people from an incompatible religion using their facilities, yet that is what the law says. [2] Anyone who provides goods, facilities or services to the public or a group of the public cannot discriminate based on religion.[3] This includes treating someone less favourably based on religion when providing goods, facilities, or services.

If someone feels they are being discriminated against, they are entitled to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission[4] or to take the matter to the Human Rights Review Tribunal.[5]

The legal test for whether behaviour is discriminatory is[6]:

Is there differential treatment or effects as between person or groups in analogous or comparable situations on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination; or
Does that differential treatment impose a material disadvantage.

If we apply this to the example of the church above, the yoga teacher may have been able to establish that they were discriminated against if the church hall had been readily hired by other members of the public or other religious groups. Banning the yoga teacher would arguably then have been ‘differential treatment’.

Can a church legally limit who uses its venues?

Section 44 of the HRA says it is unlawful for any person who supplies goods, facilities, or services to the public or to any section of the public to refuse or fail on demand to provide any other person with those goods, facilities, or services, by reason of any of the prohibited grounds of discrimination. Religion is a prohibited ground of discrimination. When it comes to a venue, the key word is ‘public’.

Going back to the example above, one option would be for the church to have a policy that its facilities are for private use, but exceptions can be made on a case-by-case basis and subject to availability. This would give the church some discretion regarding who uses its facilities and would mitigate against accusations of discrimination. The downside is that the the venue might miss out on valuable funds from hiring its venues out publicly.

Another option would be to limit which parts of a venue or facility are able to be rented out.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and our experts here at Parry Field Lawyers would be happy to answer any of your questions.

We have assisted a number of churches with ensuring their rental provisions comply with the law – we would be delighted to assist you to. If you would like to discuss your options, please contact stevenmoe@parryfield.com or annemariemora@parryfield.com.

[1] https://news.sky.com/story/catholic-church-bans-hindu-yoga-classes-10468941#:~:text=Instructor%20Cori%20Withell%20said%20the,was%20a%20Hindu%20religious%20activity.

[2] Human Rights Act 1993, section 21(1)(d).

[3] As above, section 44(1)(a) and (b).

[4] https://tikatangata.org.nz/resources-and-support/make-a-complaint

[5] https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/human-rights/

[6] Ministry of Health v Atkinson [2012] NZCA.

Trustees have important duties. If a trustee lose their mental capacity and cannot perform their trustee duties, action is needed in the best interests of the trust, and arguably in the best interests of the trustee themselves. So what happens?

What is meant by ‘loss of capacity’?

The Trusts Act 2019 (the Act) does not define what this means (except when it refers to people who are subject to an order appointing a manager under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act, or has a trustee corporation managing the person’s property under that Act).

Broadly speaking and depending on the circumstances, a trustee will have lost capacity if they do not have the capacity to make the future decisions required for their role as trustee. It is also useful to be aware that ‘capacity’ has been interpreted by the courts in numerous ways, depending on a variety of circumstances, including what the affected trustee is responsible for doing.

In New Zealand people are presumed to have mental capacity until proven otherwise. We suggest that only an appropriately qualified medical practitioner can truly make this evaluation. Not only is a medical practitioner’s decision authoritative, it is made independently from other trustees.

What needs to happen if a trustee loses capacity?

There may be negligible or substantial risks attached to an incapacitated trustee remaining in office. The more substantial the risk, the greater the need for action. Those affected by a trustee’s decision-making may need to be protected from potentially imprudent decisions, for example.

A trustee may or may not recognise that they have lost or are losing their capacity. If they do not recognise this and fail to remove themselves from the role, it falls to others to act.

The law is clear

The Act recognises the necessity of dealing with this issue. Anyone who “lacks the capacity to perform the functions of a trustee” is legally disqualified from being a trustee. Furthermore, a trustee who lacks capacity is legally required to be compulsorily removed from the role by the ‘person with power to remove trustees’ to act to remove them.

Who is the ‘person with power to remove trustees’?

The Trust Deed will normally state who has this power, and failing that, the other trustees are empowered to act. If the trustees are unwilling to act, a person holding an enduring power of attorney over the property of the trustee who is mentally incapable may act. Other options are set out in the Act.

What is the process for removing a trustee?

In most circumstances you can follow the process set out in your Trust Deed, or the process set out in the Act. If you are following the Act, you must give the affected trustee 20 working days’ notice in writing of their removal.

The affected trustee may make an application to prevent their removal within 20 working days of receiving notice of the removal decision. The affected trustee will need to produce evidence that raises a genuine dispute as to whether the removal decision was open to the person who made the decision. If the court finds that this evidence is sufficient, the onus then returns to the person who made the decision to remove the trustee to show the decision was reasonably open to them. (That is why it is advisable to have a reputable medical evaluation.) We recommend seeking legal assistance if things reach this stage.

How to give notice to a trustee

So many issues can be avoided by choosing the correct words. Our rule of thumb is to treat a trustee who has lost their capacity as you would like to be treated in the same circumstances. Although you are acting to remove the trustee, compassion is recommended as it is likely to minimise any unintended offence.

What if an incapacitated trustee refuses to leave?

The law makes provision for this situation because unfortunately it does arise—the court may make an order for removal. We suggest you seek legal assistance in this situation.

—

This article provides an overview but it is not a definitive guide. For further assistance, please contact one of our team. You may also find this article about Enduring Powers of Attorney of interest.

If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact one of our experts at Parry Field Lawyers- stevenmoe@parryfield.com, yangsu@parryfield.com, sophietremewan@parryfield.com or annemariemora@parryfield.com

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

Raffles are a common way to raise money for worthy causes. What may surprise you is that there are laws that govern how raffles need to be run. For example, it is illegal to run a raffle online. It pays to be aware of the rules before organising a raffle. Here are some important things to know.

Where are the rules?

The laws around raffles are found in the Gambling Act which exists among other reasons to ensure the integrity and fairness of games, and ensuring that money from gambling benefits the community. It’s useful to keep in mind that these laws are not there to make life difficult but to guard against improper use of funds.

What can raffles be used for?

The raffle proceeds can be used for a charitable purpose, or a non-commercial purpose that is beneficial to the whole or a section of the community. So raising money for a registered charity is fine, as is raising money for the local football club. It is not acceptable for someone to run a raffle to raise money so they can go on holiday or buy a new laptop.

What prizes are permitted?

Most prizes will be fine to raffle. However, alcohol and tobacco products prizes are illegal, as are firearms, explosives, restricted weapons or airgun. It is also illegal to offer a taonga tuturu as a prize (an object over 50 years old that relates to Māori culture, history or society and was manufactured, modified, used or brought into New Zealand by Māori), or a voucher or entitlement to commercial sexual services.

A licence is sometimes needed

Most small raffles are pretty straightforward to run. However, if the combined value of prizes is more than $5,000, and the turnover (the money raised) is more than $15,000, a Class 3 licence is needed. Apply for a licence on the DIA website.

What’s involved in a Class 3 licence?

Among other things, there are special requirements for what needs to be on the tickets. The prize needs to be worth at least 20% of the prize’s ‘gross potential income’ (which is the amount you expect to raise, calculated by multiplying the number of tickets by the cost of each ticket). Within 3 months of the raffle finishing the organisers must provide an audited Audit and Prize Statement to the Secretary. More information is set out on the DIA website.

Other rules

Even if you do not need a licence, there are other rules to be aware of, including:

The rules for the competition must be clear to all participants.
If tickets are sold to the general public, the time and location of the prize draw must be open to the public.
Prizes can only be given to winners and must be given to winners within 3 months of the result, unless the winner cannot be identified or located or does not accept the prize. Prizes cannot be changed once the raffle has started.

—

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

As you may know, all incorporated societies in New Zealand must re-register under the new Incorporated Societies Act 2022 (the “new Act”). If this is news to you, we have written an article about it here.

The new Act requires a society’s name to end with either ‘Manatōpū’, ‘Incorporated’ or ‘Inc’ (or more than one of these if you so wish). However, to change your society’s name, even just one word, you must reregister first then apply to the Registrar for a name change.

To change the name of your society, you need a RealMe® login, an Incorporated Societies Register online services account, and you need the requisite authority in your society to manage information on your society’s register. You need to log into your online services account and select ‘Name Change’ on the ‘View Details’ page and type in the new name. You may click ‘Name availability check’ to make sure you can use the name. If there are any documents in support of your name change (i.e. if another entity has provided consent for you to use the name) you should include these. Then, after completing the signatory details you can submit it. See Companies Office for more information about naming your society here.

The Registrar must then approve the name and will send an email confirmation that they have registered the change within three working days. An updated Certificate of Incorporation will be sent to you. You do not need to update your society’s constitution as it will be treated as having the new name; however, this should be done in your next general meeting.

—

We have supported many incorporated societies and produce many free guides and resources on our Incorporated Societies information hub here. This article is not a substitute to legal advice and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our experts here at Parry Field Lawyers.

We help with unincorporated and incorporated societies and answer questions all the time. If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team on stevenmoe@parryfield.com sophietremewan@parryfield.com or annemariemora@parryfield.com.

Payroll giving occurs when employers enable their employees to make donations directly from their gross wages. The tax benefit is that the amount of PAYE or withholding tax the employee pays is reduced by the amount of their donation. They also receive a ‘tax credit’ from the donation, which is 33.3% of the donation value.

Payroll giving is therefore a bit simpler than making a donation directly to a charity as donors do not have to submit their donation receipts to IRD to claim the tax credit.

What needs to be in place for payroll giving?

Employers will only be able to offer this service if they file their payroll taxes electronically. They can either use the myIR online service, or attach files from their own payroll software.

Even if an employer has the ability to use payroll giving, it is discretionary. Employers may also use their discretion to choose how the donations will operate, for example, they may designate specific charities that can be donated to, and they may designate a minimum donation amount.

Only ‘tax donee’ organisations can receive payroll donations.

What is a donee organisation?

IRD maintains a list of donee organisations. Charities are added to the list if they use at least 75% of their funds within New Zealand (that is, they operate “wholly or mainly” here), or for the public good if an organisation is not a charity. For more on the threshold, you can check to see if a charity is on the IRD donee organisation list here.

Other resources

The IRD has put together this excellent guide to payroll giving.

It is also possible to claim tax credits on donations to charities supporting overseas causes.

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team, stevenmoe@parryfield.com, or annemariemora@parryfield.com at Parry Field Lawyers.

We are often asked when a charity will be registered after applying to Charity Services. This is because the time between applying and getting positive news can be 12 weeks, or more. The simple answer is Charities Services can backdate to when you first applied, but there are two criteria under section 20 of the Charities Act 2005 (the Act) that must be considered. These might affect if they can backdate and are:

When did Charities Services receive a “complete” application?
Was the entity “qualified for registration” as a charitable entity at all times during the period between the effective registration date and the date the entity became registered as a charitable entity?

A completed application requires a completed application form and a copy of the entity’s legal rules. An entity is “qualified for registration” where the application meets all key registration requirements under the Act. This could have an impact on the date. For example, if an entity was required to amend its rules to meet these requirements, then Charities Services can only backdate the registration date to the date of these amendments were legally effective. However, the High Court has allowed the backdating of an application where such amendments were “for the avoidance of doubt”.

Charities Services have the power to backdate an application to the date they received a complete application for an entity that is qualified for registration at all times from the period of effective registration and the date of actual registration. A backdated registration is referred to as the effective registration time, being the date registration was effective rather than when it occurred.

The High Court has interpreted the Charities Services ability to backdate as a means of addressing the otherwise adverse consequences for charities of administrative delays. However, this discretionary ability was not found to extend to charities that have been deregistered and have applied for another application to be registered. The Court, alternatively, does have the power to do so. This means that if a charity wishes to have a backdated registration following deregistration it would need to appeal to the courts for an order to do so.

In summary, while most applications can be backdated if you are asked to amend your documents it may not be possible unless the changes are not very material. We have helped many charities get registered and are happy to provide advice for your specific situation or answer any questions you may have.

If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact one of our experts at Parry Field Lawyers- stevenmoe@parryfield.com, sophietremewan@parryfield.com or annemariemora@parryfield.com

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

What is the minimum age of a trustee?

We often get asked about whether a young person can become a trustee. There are a few points to consider which we are going to go into here. The minimum age of a trustee is 18 years old under the Trusts Act 2019 (Trusts Act) under sections 15 and 20. However, the minimum age of an officer of a charity is 16 years old, as long as one of the trustees of the charity is at least 18 years or older.

How does this work?

An officer in relation to a charitable entity is someone in a position of significant influence over substantial decisions of the entity. It includes trustees of a trust, a member of a board, and a person occupying any other position that allows them to exercise such influence.[1] It also includes a person with powers conferred on them to make decisions which would otherwise fall to trustees, members of the board or the entity’s governing body.

Charities Services has stated that any person under the age of 16 is disqualified from being an officer under section 36B of the Charities Act 2005 (Charities Act). This acknowledges that people of 16 or 17 years of age can partake in charitable work as an officer. Charities are still required to have at least one officer that is 18 years or older as an essential requirement under section 13 of the Charities Act. The difference in age requirements for trusts and charities comes down to the responsibilities in each role, specifically in entering contracts and holding property.[2]

So, where someone of the age of 16 or 17 cannot be a trustee of a trust they may be an officer of a charity if there is at least one officer that is 18 years or older at any given time.

What does this mean for charitable trusts?

Where a charitable organisation wishes to be a charitable trust, the officers all need to be 18 or older to comply with the Trusts Act. If the charity wishes to be an incorporated society, they require one person that is 18 years old or older to be the contact person.

How about for an incorporated society?

Incorporated societies allow under 18-year-olds to be officers provided they are not under the age of 16 years of age.[3] However, the Incorporated Societies Act 2022 requires every society to have at least 1 contact person who is at least 18 years of age.[4]

How about for a charitable company?

The Companies Act 1993 provides that anyone under the age of 18 are disqualified from being a director of a company. The Charities Act 2005 confirms that individuals that are disqualified under the Companies Act are also disqualified from being officers of charitable entities also. This means directors of charitable companies must be 18 years or older.

We have supported many charities and produce lots of free guides such as the Charities in New Zealand Legal Handbook. If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact one of our experts at Parry Field Lawyers- stevenmoe@parryfield.com, sophietremewan@parryfield.com, or annemariemora@parryfield.com

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

—-

[1] Charities Act 2005, s 4 meaning of “officer”.

[2] Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, s 86.

[3] Incorporated Societies Act 2022, s 47.

[4] Incorporated Societies Act 2022, s 113-114.

ChatGPT is a chatbot that was released in November 2022 and it has certainly got people talking. Some say it heralds the demise of lawyers, among other professionals, because of its ability to answer questions and draft documents. We tested it for ourselves and while we believe it does have implications for lawyers, we do not recommend doing away with your legal advice just yet.

A chatbot uses artificial intelligence to simulate human conversation using a large language model, in this case text. Our instruction to ChatGPT was: “Draft a Trust Deed for a New Zealand charitable trust.”

The chatbot’s response was partly correct but overlooked critical details needed to make the document legally valid. It ignored the need for a ‘donor’, the person who creates the trust. It failed to stipulate that Trustee signatures need to be witnessed, which is fundamental to the deed being in the proper form. It included only some of the mandatory duties of Trustees. Overall, it performed at a 5/10, but as the document generated would not be legally binding, it was a ‘fail’. In reality, people can already find better templates for charitable trust deeds using a standard internet search.

We also asked ChatGPT: “Is it better for my organisation to be an incorporated society or charitable trust?”

The chatbot set out some of the differences and similarities but wasn’t overly useful. A much more useful comparison is already available, for example, on our website: https://www.parryfield.com/incorporated-societies-vs-charitable-trusts/

Of course the question was a trick one because we did not provide any details of the organisation and each organisation is different. ChatGPT cleverly noted this at the end of its answer: “Ultimately, the choice …… will depend on the specific needs and goals of your organisation. It is advisable to seek legal advice and consider all relevant factors before making a decision.”

We couldn’t agree more. Our team has helped countless clients with exactly this question because it can be confusing. Our legal advice is based on decades of experience across hundreds of organisations and all entity types. At this stage it is only real-life lawyers who can elicit from clients the critical information to advise on the best entity type.

Our verdict

ChatGPT does not purport to provide legal advice. It acknowledges its limitations including that it may occasionally generate incorrect information or produce harmful instructions or biased content.

However, ChatGPT is just one AI tool. The legal profession has already embraced AI for things like contract reviews, research and document discovery. In a legal first in 2022, an AI start-up in the United Kingdom was used to sift through hundreds of documents in a murder trial saving the legal team four weeks.

AI offers enhanced efficiency and might just free lawyers up from many of the repetitive and mundane tasks they currently undertake, which could be good for lawyers and clients. However, it is a little while before it is advisable to hand over real legal challenges to an AI ‘lawyer’.

We recently helped to edit a collection of essays on the topic of AI and the law for The Law Association which you can download here.

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

We help with charity set ups and answering questions all the time. If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team on stevenmoe@parryfield.com, sophietremewan@parryfield.com, or yangsu@parryfield.com at Parry Field Lawyers

Why minutes matter

Accurate and thorough board minutes are as critical for charitable entities as they are for companies. Well-written minutes help to ensure charitable entities are legally compliant and assist effective and efficient governance. They are an important record for current, absent and future board members about meeting discussions and decisions as they provide concise summaries of key points discussed.

Furthermore, accurately noting conflicts of interest, identifying documents tabled during meetings, and maintaining a list of action items all help the board to manage its workload and responsibilities effectively, ensuring progress is tracked and necessary actions are completed for future meetings.

Legal Requirements

In New Zealand, different types of charitable entities have specific legal requirements for meeting minutes.

Charitable Trusts: The Trusts Act 2019 requires trustees to keep core documents, including any records of trustee decisions made and any written contracts entered into, which will typically be records in minutes.[1]

Incorporated Societies: The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 stipulates that minutes of annual general meetings must be maintained.[2] Sections 89 allows resolutions to be passed without a meeting, for example, via email, if a society’s constitution allows. Failure to adequately hold and maintain minutes for annual general meetings constitutes an infringement offense, carrying a $500 fee per violation.

Charitable Companies: The Companies Act 1993 requires charitable company directors to maintain detailed minutes of all directors’ and shareholders’ meetings, documenting decisions and resolutions. The Companies Act also requires that minutes be accessible for inspection by directors, shareholders, and regulatory authorities.

What minutes should include

There are numerous templates available for minutes. Our advice is to tailor any template to the needs and preferences of your entity.

The administrative basics.

Start and finish times.
Name of chair.
Name of minute taker.
Attendance: those present and absent, and whether a quorum was established and maintained.
Date, Time, and Location: Schedule and details for the next meeting.

Each agenda item.

Note the item number and topic and keep this consistent with the agenda for ease of reference.
Note key points discussed. Record sufficient detail for people to understand the topic and discussion. Avoid unnecessary detail. Avoid attributing any comment to a particular Board member.
Resolutions: Detail the specific resolutions. We recommend that the chair sit beside the minute-taker and verbalise the proposed resolution for the meeting to hear. This allows meeting attendees to hear what is being minuted, to ensure it is accurate and makes sense.
Good minutes should signal whether something was simply ‘noted’ or ‘resolved’. If something is being tabled for the awareness of the board but does not require a decision, it is enough to note what was tabled and that it was noted. If the board paper has asked the Board to make a decision, the minutes should state that the matter was resolved.
If relevant, note whether voting was unanimous, tied, or whether a casting vote was necessary. (Tip – refer to your entity’s rules to see what is required for decision making.)
Note whether any attendees absented themselves due to a conflict of interest.
Actions: List any actions, who the actions are assigned to, and the date required. It can be useful to list the actions in a separate part of the minutes for easy reference.

Distribution

It is best practice to send the draft minutes to Board members within a week of the meeting, or soon after. Board members should review these while the content is still fresh, and send any proposed amendments to the Chair.

Approval

The approval of minutes should be a standard agenda item for each meeting. At this time, the Chair will ask if any board members have changes to the minutes. The meeting minutes can then be ‘approved’ or ‘approved subject to the changes noted’.

Storage and Accessibility

Minutes must be securely stored while also being readily accessible if required.

—

This article is general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice. You should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source.

[1] Section 45, Trusts Act 2019.

[2] Section 84, Incorporated Societies Act 2022.

Wound up incorporated society

Shell incorporated society entity

Christchurch CBD

Christchurch – Riccarton

Rolleston

Hokitika

Auckland