If you are married, or in a civil union or de facto relationship, New Zealand’s Property (Relationships) Act 1976 will have an impact on what happens to your property in the event of separation or death.

The Act makes provision, however, for you and your spouse to specifically agree on what is to happen to your property by entering into a contracting out agreement.


Who can enter into an agreement?

Section 21 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 provides that a husband and wife, civil union partners, de facto partners, or two persons in contemplation of entering into a marriage, civil union or de facto relationship may contract out of the provisions of the Act.

Why enter into an agreement?

There are numerous reasons for electing to contract out of the Act. Usually, it is to avoid the presumption of equal sharing of property that arises when the relationship ends.  However, an agreement may also assist with asset, estate or tax planning.  It may be a desire by one or both parties to preserve all of the property owned or acquired by them prior to the commencement of the relationship as his or her own separate property. Where one partner has children from a previous relationship, there may be a dersire to ensure that those children are adequately provided for from their property. Alternatively, the parties may simply wish to record their decision to treat certain property differently.

What can be included in the agreement?

Section 21D of the Act sets out what can be included in an agreement. An agreement can:

  • declare property to be separate or relationship property;
  • define the share each party to the agreement has in any part or all of the relationship property;
  • define shares on death;
  • provide for the calculation of the shares; and
  • prescribe the method by which the relationship property is to be divided.

Section 21 of the Act permits parties to an agreement to make any arrangements they think fit with respect to their property, including property acquired in the future by one or both parties.

“Property” is specifically defined in section 2 of the Act and includes the following:

  • real property (i.e. land);
  • personal property;
  • any estate or interest in any real property or personal property;
  • a debt; and
  • any other right or interest.

How is the agreement made valid?

Section 21F of the Act records an agreement will be void unless it complies with certain requirements. Those include the following:

  • The agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties.
  • Each party to the agreement must have independent legal advice before signing the agreement.
  • The signature of each party to the agreement must be witnessed by a lawyer.
  • The lawyer who witnesses the signature of a party must certify that, before that party signed the agreement, the lawyer explained to that party the effect and implications of the agreement.

Future Considerations

It is important to recognise that an agreement contracting out of the provisions of the Act needs to be revisited on a regular basis. It is impossible when drafting an agreement to anticipate every eventuality just as it is impossible to foresee, at the outset, the longevity of a relationship.


The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

Do you and your married spouse own and live in your home? Are either of you self-employed or involved in some occupation that involves personal exposure to financial risks(e.g. personal guarantees)?  If you answer ‘yes’ to both these questions you should seriously consider registering your home under the Joint Family Homes Act 1964. It could prove to be very cheap protection against losing equity in your home in the event of being sued or bankrupted.

What is a Joint Family Home?

Most people think their home is registered as a joint family home because both their names are on the title. This is WRONG! It requires a special application to Land Information New Zealand for your home to be registered as a Joint Family Home (“JFH”) under New Zealand’s Joint Family Home Act 1964.

The cost is between $500.00 – $1,000.00 plus GST. Costs vary depending on whether or not you wish to publicly advertise the application. The advantage of advertising is that the protection takes effect within six months rather than the standard two years after application. Also your bank may charge a small fee if you have a mortgage.

What is the Protection?

You will not be protected against secured creditors e.g. your mortgagee, but part of your property will be protected against unsecured creditors; e.g. trade creditors to your business, if it is not a company.

Essentially the Joint Family Home Act 1964 creates a protected fund of $103,000 which is safe from unsecured creditors. This fund is to assist in the purchase of a replacement home unless unsecured creditors convince the High Court of New Zealand to exercise its discretion and agree to the sale of the home. (In practice creditors are reluctant to apply to the Courts because of high cost, and the reason that a judge has to balance the general desirability of preserving the matrimonial home for the family on the one hand against the just claims of creditors on the other.)

The Court cannot order the sale of a JFH home if there is less than $103,000 equity in the home. A mortgagee, however, can sell the home (in the event of default) no matter what equity the owners have. The protection is all the more worthwhile if the matrimonial home has previously only been registered in the name of one spouse.

Summary

For quick protection against creditors, some lawyers think a JFH application is more secure than selling the property to a family trust and dealing with the debt back. While this is debatable, especially at higher levels of equity, it is certainly more affordable. Protection, however, can be lost if it is found at the time of application that the parties were unable to pay all their debts (other than those charged against the house) without recourse to the house sale proceeds.

One way to view the application is as a type of insurance. The insurance is cheap and involves a once only payment which is good for as long as you own the house. It is a simple procedure and the loss is small even if, at the end of the day, protection is not achieved.

Also for a small fee the registration can be transferred to your next home, and registration does not preclude transferring ownership to a family trust later on.

There are a couple of catches : a) you must be legally married to apply for a JFH, and b) if you die, the property automatically goes to the surviving spouse regardless of what your Will says!

As there are other criteria to satisfy, you should contact your Parry Field Lawyer to see if there are advantages for you in registering your home as a Joint Family Home.


The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer

Section 15 of New Zealand’s Property Relationships Act 1976 was introduced to address issues of inequality between partners following a breakdown of their relationship. The section empowers the Court, following a division of relationship property, to compensate a spouse/partner if his or her living standards and income will be significantly less than the other party because of the division of functions in the relationship.

Read more

When purchasing a property, it pays to investigate the history of the buildings on the land. If there are no records of building consents having been issued by the council, then at best the buildings may have been constructed without council approval and may not comply with the building code. At worst, they may be dangerous for use and occupation.

Background To The Building Consent Process

The Building Act 2004 (“the Act”) governs all building works in New Zealand. It states that such work must comply with the building code. The code is made up of regulations which prescribe the functional requirements for buildings and the performance criteria they must meet for their intended use.

Before undertaking building work, the owner of the property must obtain approval from a building consent authority. Usually, the building consent authority is the local council. Council approval for building work is known as a “building consent”.

During construction and once construction is complete, the council will inspect the work to ensure compliance with the conditions of the building consent and the building code. If the council approves the work, then it issues a code compliance certificate. It is an offence to carry out any work requiring a building consent if the work is not in accordance with the terms of the building consent. Also, subject to some exceptions, until such time as a code compliance certificate has been issued, it is an offence to occupy the building.

What Happens When Building Work Has Been Done Without A Building Consent?

Building consents cannot be issued retrospectively. However, if the work has been completed and a building consent was required but not obtained, then an application to the council for a “certificate of acceptance” may be made. This involves the council inspecting the work to determine if it complies with the building code. If it does, then it may issue a certificate of acceptance. However, such a certificate cannot be issued if the building work was carried out prior to 1992 as the building code was not in existence prior to that date.

It is not uncommon to come across properties where the buildings on the land have been constructed with a building permit or consent but the work has either never been completed, or if it has, the council has not approved it. If the work was carried out prior to 1 January 1993 and provided that the building is not “dangerous” or “unsanitary” as defined in the Act, then the council cannot take any action to require the owner to complete the work in accordance with the original building permit.

Make Sure Your Contract is Conditional on Approval of a LIM Report

The best way to check that there are no unauthorised buildings on a property is to obtain a Land Information Memorandum (known as a “LIM report”) before you buy it. This includes a summary of all records held by the council in relation to the property including details of building permits, consents, code compliance certificates and certificates of acceptance. To protect your position, any sale and purchase agreement you sign should be subject to approval of a LIM report for the property.

It is worth remembering that although the absence of permits or consents may not pose a problem while you live in the property, it may well become a problem once you decide to sell it. For that reason, a LIM report is money well spent. It could save you a great deal more at a later date.


The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

Most of us are used to living in an environment where there is a certain amount of noise. However, there are also times when noise can become excessive and interfere with the peace, comfort and convenience of other people.

Read more

New Zealand’s Building Act 2004 (“Act”) impacts on vendors selling properties on which building work has been undertaken. Purchasers now often request evidence of compliance with the Act.  Parry Field Lawyers provide legal advice on a range of property matters including buying and selling property.

 

Building Code

One of the fundamental principles of the Act is that all building works must comply with the building code.  Compliance with the building code is mandatory regardless of whether or not a building consent is required for the work.  Even for minor building projects, householders need to check whether or not the building code is relevant and if it is, must ensure that the building work complies with the requirements of the code.

Evidence of Compliance

The most common way a building owner may provide evidence that work complies with the building code is by obtaining and being able to provide the purchaser with a Code Compliance Certificate (“CCC”). A CCC is issued where a building consent is applied for before building work is commenced. The CCC effectively provides that the consent authority is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the building work complies with the building consent. It is the building consent that is crucial in ensuring that the performance standards set out in the building code are met by the finished building product.

A building consent will lapse if work does not commence within 12 months of the date of issue. However, it appears that commencement of work within the first 12 months after the building consent is issued preserves the consent indefinitely.

Certificate of Acceptance

Sometimes a purchaser will ascertain that building work for which a building consent and CCC should have been issued, has not been completed in accordance with those requirements. The Act provides that in that situation a building consent authority can issue a certificate of acceptance.

A certificate of acceptance certifies, to the best of the building consent authority’s knowledge and on reasonable grounds, that, as far as it could ascertain, the building work complies with the building code.

Obviously this certificate conveys a far lower degree of quality assurance than a building consent or CCC. It replaces what was previously referred to as a “safe and sanitary” letter which followed an inspection by the Council certifying to the effect that the building was deemed to be neither unsafe nor unsanitary.

Building Warrant of Fitness

Another matter which may require consideration when purchasing a commercial building is whether or not a building warrant of fitness is required and is up to date. If a building contains systems or services that require ongoing maintenance in order to function at the level demanded by the building code, a compliance schedule must be established in regard to those systems to ensure that maintenance is routinely carried out. The compliance schedule sets out the inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures required to ensure that those systems meet performance standards. The building warrant of fitness confirms that the inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures set out in the schedule have been complied with for the foregoing 12 months. Accordingly, building owners bear responsibility for engaging an independent qualified person (IQP) to carry out an inspection and must display a copy of the building warrant of fitness in a public area of the respective building.  There are significant fines for a building owner who fails to obtain a compliance schedule or to display a current building warrant of fitness.

 


 

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

If you have any concerns that you may have a leaky home, it’s important that you act quickly to investigate your concerns.  Parry Field Lawyers provide legal advice on a range of property matters including leaky home claims.

Read more

Shading from trees can be a common source of tension between neighbours.  Have you ever purchased a property and later discovered that your neighbour’s trees will eventually block your view or prevent your property from having the benefit of sunlight? Parry Field Lawyers provide legal advice on a range of property matters including disputes with neighbours.

Read more

New Zealand’s Property Law Act 2007 (the Act) sets out rules for landlords wanting to cancel leases that their tenants have breached.  The landlord must follow a specified process before they can cancel the lease.  The process involves first giving notice and then taking possession of the property.  Parry Field Lawyers provide legal advice on a range of property matters including cancelling a lease.

Read more

The New Zealand Government enacted the Construction Contracts Act 2002 to help sub-contractors get paid on time and without fuss for construction work and to enable fast resolution to disputes arising under construction contracts. Parry Field Lawyers provides assistance with making and defending claims under the Construct Contracts Act.

Does the Construction Contracts Act apply to me?

The Act applies to a wide range of construction work, namely:

  • Construction, installation, alteration, repair, restoration, maintenance, extension, demolition, removal, or dismantling of any building or other structure.
  • Installing roadways, pipelines, water mains, sewers, electricity, water, gas, or telephone reticulation.
  • Heating , lighting, air conditioning, ventilation, power supply, drainage, sanitation, water supply or fire protection, security, and communications systems.
  • Any cleaning work carried out as part of the construction work.
  • Preparation for construction work such as site clearance, earth-moving, excavation, laying foundations; scaffolding.
  • Site restoration and landscaping, painting and decorating.

Making a Payment Claim

The parties to a construction contract are free to agree between themselves on:

  1. The number of progress payments under the contract.
  2. The gap between those payments.
  3. The amount of each of those payments.
  4. The date when each of those payments becomes due.

Where the contract does not address these issues, a contractor who carries out construction work for another person is entitled to issue monthly ‘payment claims’ for work done during that month. A payment claim must either be disputed or paid by the customer within the time period agreed for a response in the contract, by default this is 20 working days.

A payment claim must:

  1. Be in writing.
  2. Contain sufficient details to identify the construction contract to which the progress payment relates
  3. Identify the construction work and the relevant period to which the progress payment relates.
  4. Indicate a claimed amount and the due date for payment.
  5. Indicate the manner in which the payee calculated the claimed amount.
  6. State that it is made under the Construction Contracts Act.

If a payment claim is to be given to a residential occupier of a property, it must include a notice in a form prescribed by the Act setting out what the residential customer must do in response to the payment claim.

Payment Schedules

If the customer wants to dispute the payment claim, they must object to the payment claim by giving the contractor a ‘payment schedule’ in writing identifying the payment claim to which it relates and indicating what amount the customer is prepared to pay (which can be nothing). The amount the customer is willing to pay is called the ‘scheduled amount’.

If the scheduled amount is less than the claimed amount, the payment schedule must indicate:

  1. How the customer calculated the scheduled amount.
  2. The customer’s reason or reasons for the difference between the scheduled amount and the claimed amount.
  3. In a case where the difference is because the customer is withholding payment on any basis, the customer’s reason or reasons for withholding payment.

If the customer does not give the contractor a payment schedule by the deadline agreed in the contract, the customer becomes liable to pay the full amount claimed in the payment claim and the contractor may recover it from the customer by court proceedings, which cannot easily be defended by the customer.

Adjudication

If the customer issues a payment schedule within the time limit disputing all or part of the claimed amount, the contractor can refer the matter as a dispute for adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act.

The Act provides an adjudication process that enables a contractor to quickly get a decision on how much is owed by the customer. After the adjudicator is appointed, the contractor has five days to provide information in support of their claim. The customer then has five working days to respond. The Adjudicator must then issue a decision within 30 working days.

An adjudicator’s decision can be enforced in the District or High Court in the same that a judgment of those courts can be enforced.  This means the adjudication process can be an effective way to obtain quick payment for work.

 

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and you should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. If we can assist in any way please do not hesitate to contact Paul Cowey at Parry Field Lawyers (348-8480), paulcowey@parryfield.com