Not for Profits - Parry Field Lawyers

IRD recently shared two sets of slides regarding their consultation with charities at the end of 2025.

In this note, we summarise some of the key points they make on a variety of topics. We recommend reviewing the slides yourself (contact Partner, Steven Moe, if you’d like a copy) but this could provide a starting point to show areas that may be of interest.

Donor-controlled charities

Many submitters did not support introducing a bespoke donor-controlled charity regime in the form proposed, preferring better enforcement of existing charity law and fiduciary duties.
Concerns were raised that the proposed definition is too broad and could capture low-risk entities, including certain Māori organisations, iwi entities and widely held structures.
There was support in principle for a minimum distribution rule to ensure tax-benefited funds are regularly applied to charitable purposes.
However, a 5 percent asset-based distribution rate was generally viewed as too high in the New Zealand context. Submitters preferred an income-based approach, flexibility, exemptions and multi-year averaging.
Integrity measures targeting circular arrangements and non-arm’s length transactions were supported conceptually, but many submitters were concerned about complexity and compliance costs.
A cap on donation tax concessions for donations to donor-controlled charities was the least preferred option and was seen as a blunt instrument that could dampen large-scale philanthropy.

Membership subscriptions and member transactions

Inland Revenue has indicated that many member trading and service transactions are taxable under current law, which may bring additional organisations into the tax net.
Submitters expressed concern about compliance impacts, particularly for volunteer-run organisations.
There was strong support for clear, practical guidance with examples.
Many favoured retaining non-taxable treatment for genuine membership subscriptions, with a focus on the substance of transactions.
Some submitters suggested clearer legislative distinctions between commercial trading and social or mutual member activities.

Tax-free threshold

Officials have proposed increasing the long-standing $1,000 tax-free threshold, potentially to $10,000.
There was broad support for increasing the threshold to reflect inflation and reduce compliance costs for smaller organisations.
There was little support for a cliff-face approach that would remove the concession entirely once a threshold is exceeded.
Alternatives suggested included an abating threshold and alignment with financial reporting thresholds.

Filing requirements and RWT exemption

Submitters generally supported simplified filing requirements for small not-for-profits, particularly given their volunteer-led nature.
Education and proportionate compliance responses were preferred over punitive measures.
Concerns were raised about proposals to increase oversight of resident withholding tax exemptions if this shifted compliance costs onto financial institutions.

Donation tax credit simplifications

In-year donation tax credit refunds were broadly supported as a way to improve donor cash flow and potentially support increased giving, provided participation remains voluntary and does not increase administrative burdens on charities.
Allowing donors to allocate their donation tax credit directly to the donee organisation was viewed by many as a potentially more impactful reform.
Practical issues were noted, including donor anonymity, stewardship considerations and whether an allocated credit should itself qualify for a further donation tax credit.

If you have any questions regarding the information above, please contact one of our team.

Published February 2026.

New regulations have provided an interim fix for residents associations left in limbo by new requirements under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022. But as a temporary exemption, residents associations will still need to consider their future structure.

Background

A Residents Association is a type of incorporated society that exists for the benefit of the community it serves. It might maintain community facilities or common areas, or simply serve as a forum for residents to come together and organise community activities. Some Residents Associations will own common land as well.

Most Residents Associations will be registered under the Incorporated Societies Act 1908, which means that they will need to prepare for and re-register under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022. However, the new Act prohibits surplus assets from being distributed to members where the society is wound up.

This will cause issues for many Residents Associations who own common land, as “winding up” provisions often provide that surplus assets should go to the members. For Residents Associations with common land, this ensures that the residents will get a share in the land when and if the society winds up.

This prohibition is to preserve the principle that incorporated societies should not operate for the financial gain of members. However, for Residents Associations that own common land or other property on behalf of residents, if the association was wound up, residents would lose rights to property they justifiably see as being theirs.

What does the exemption mean for residents associations?

In response to these concerns, a temporary exemption has been made allowing Residents Associations to retain the clause in their constitution that enables distribution of surplus assets to members for the transition period.

The exemption is provided for under the Incorporated Society regulations. Residents Associations will still need to re-register under the 2022 Act by the deadline of 5 April 2026. At the same time, they must also notify the Registrar that the constitution they are submitting retains a clause permitting distribution of surplus assets to members if the association winds up.

The temporary exemption will remain in place until 5 October 2028. During this period, Residents Associations must either amend their surplus assets provisions to comply with the Incorporated Societies Act 2022 or consider an alternative ownership structure.

Time to consider an alternative structure?

Although this exemption does not provide a permanent fix for Residents Associations under the new Act, what it does do is provide time for Residents Associations to consider their options and what the best structure will be going forward.

If your Residents Association is in this situation, let us know – we are happy to support you in considering your options moving forward. For further information on how the requirements under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022 will affect Residents Associations, check out this article.

We help with unincorporated and incorporated societies and answer questions all the time. If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team.

When we talk about funding for charities and not-for-profits, many of us still default to the traditional model of donations, grants, and fundraising events. That approach can be powerful, but it is only part of the picture. A growing number of organisations are blending those familiar methods with a newer paradigm that treats their purpose as something to partner with and invest in, not simply to sponsor. By exploring tools such as impact investment, social enterprises, and income generating assets, it becomes possible to build more sustainable models that sit alongside, rather than replace, the old funding routes. Below are examples of some funding sources.

Under old paradigm: this is a continuation of an older charity mindset that asks people to donate to a cause and involves:

asking for donations from the public
running events, fundraisers, or dinners
seeking grants from local government
seeking funding from central government directly, if there is a relationship with a department
lottery grants or community organisation grants
apply for funding from privately endowed foundations (check their criteria)
Iwi-based organisations
approach community foundations (often a regional focus), energy trusts, or gaming trusts

Under new paradigm: seek partnership via impact investing and look for ways that a business element could be combined to ensure sustainability, such as charging for services or goods, or creating an asset of value. This is hard work but it is often a more long-term approach and can be done in combination with more traditional approaches. This could involve:

a start-up that creates an app to generate income, while also advancing purpose
a business that employs the people you want to help (for example, employing former prisoners)
providing an investment opportunity for property with housing or temporary accommodation, where income is also generated while the purpose fulfilled

For further information, an overview report with examples from the Centre for Social Impact is here.

Can a trust, or its trustees collectively, be regarded as a “person” and therefore held directly accountable for breaches of Health and Safety law? In this article, we consider how a tragic accident in 2020 led to a court ruling on this issue, clarifying the liability of trustees under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 and highlighting the consequences for those managing unincorporated trusts.

On 17 September 2020, a tragic accident occurred where a child’s jacket was caught in machinery and the child was fatally injured. The farm where the accident occurred was owned by RH & Jury Trust (the Trust), an unincorporated trust. WorkSafe New Zealand charged the Trust with breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (“HSWA”), as a “person conducting a business or undertaking” (“PCBU”) under sections 37(1), 48(1) and 48(2)(c).

The District Court ruled that the Trust nor the Trustees could be charged with the aforementioned breaches, and WorkSafe appealed this decision as a point of law to the High Court. The High Court had to determine whether a trust (or its trustees collectively) constitute a “person” under the HSWA.

While the Court determined that the Trust is not a “person” under section 16 of HSWA, it did determine that the trustees come within the definition of “person” as an unincorporated body of persons.

This decision now allows for the trustees themselves to be prosecuted collectively under the HSWA as a “person”. Crucially, because the trustees can now be considered “a body of persons”, the higher penalties under the HSWA become available – including the maximum fine of $1.5 million.

Implications:

Trustees cannot assume that the trust structure shields them from liability when it comes to Health and Safety.
Trustees of unincorporated trusts can be prosecuted collectively for breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.
This opens the door for significant penalties, including the maximum fines under section 48(2)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, which are up to $1.5 million.
Regular risk assessments, policies, and documented compliance measures are essential to diminish the risk of liability.

We help many charities, Trusts, and other entities. If you have any questions on this topic or others, feel free to contact us and check out our free resources on our website.

For-purpose entities – such as charities, trusts, incorporated societies, and other not-for-profits – play a vital role in New Zealand’s social, cultural, and environmental fabric. Whether your entity is updating governance documents, reviewing its structure, or addressing a legal issue, engaging a lawyer can be an important step in ensuring compliance with the law and safeguarding the organisation’s mission and resources. To make the most of this investment, it helps to approach the process strategically. Here are some practical tips for for-purpose groups to consider before engaging legal advice.

1. Review What’s Working (and What’s Not)

Before engaging a lawyer, take time to review your existing documents – such as your trust deed, constitution, governance policies, or operational frameworks. Identify what is functioning well and where you are experiencing challenges. Are there clauses that no longer reflect the way your organisation operates? Are governance roles clearly defined? This internal review allows your lawyer to focus on areas that genuinely require attention, saving time and cost.

2. Engage Early, Not Late

Legal input is most effective when sought early – before you begin drafting changes or responding to a legal issue. Waiting too long may result in duplicated effort or the need to undo work that isn’t legally sound. A brief initial conversation can help your lawyer identify key priorities, assess risks, and ensure your proposed approach is on the right track from the outset.

3. Be Clear and Organised in Your Instructions

When engaging a lawyer, provide clear and detailed instructions. Outline your goals, the context behind any proposed changes, and any concerns you have. Include relevant background materials such as past minutes, correspondence, or current governance documents. The more context your lawyer has, the more efficiently they can provide targeted and useful advice.

4. Keep Focused on the Big Picture

Avoid getting bogged down in minor technicalities unless they materially affect your organisation. It’s important to prioritise the key challenges – such as legal compliance, governance structure, and decision-making authority – that can impact your ability to function effectively. For example, are your governance structures consistent with the Incorporated Societies Act 2022 and/or the Charities Act 2005, or other relevant legislation? Are you meeting your obligations under the Trusts Act 2019? Keeping your focus on strategic matters ensures your legal budget is used wisely. For more information on whether your entity is consistent with the relevant legislation, see our Information Hubs on our website here.

5. Value Quality Over Speed

It’s natural to want to minimise costs, but rushing legal work can lead to oversights that may prove costly down the line. Investing in quality legal advice can help prevent disputes, clarify responsibilities, and ensure your documents reflect both legal requirements and your organisation’s needs. In the long term, this can provide both peace of mind and financial savings by avoiding future legal issues.

Need legal help?

If your for-purpose entity requires guidance on governance, compliance, or restructuring, the team at Parry Field Lawyers can help. We work with a wide range of non-profit and charitable organisations to ensure their structures are robust, lawful, and fit for purpose. Reach out to us for more information.

This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please contact a qualified legal professional. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit to the source.

Who is liable if there is a breach of health and safety? A new case gives us some insights.

A former Port of Auckland CEO was found guilty for breaching his duties as an officer under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (the “Act”). It is an important reminder that all officers have critical roles to play in health and safety – even if they are operating at some distance from ‘where the work is done’.

The former CEO, Mr Gibson, was found guilty as an officer of failing to exercise due diligence under section 44 of the Act. A port worker died while loading containers on a ship berthed at the port. The judgment found Mr Gibson had exposed the worker to a risk of being struck by objects falling from cranes.

In this situation, the port was first found guilty and required to pay a fine of $561,000.

Why is this newsworthy?

We are more used to hearing about directors and / or entities being charged with health and safety at work breaches. This situation is about an officer being found in breach.

Under the Act, any person that has ‘significant influence over a Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking’ (“PCBU”) may be an ‘officer’ and subject to officer duties and liable for any breaches of these.

It is a little confusing as to why the Board itself was not also held liable.

What does due diligence mean?

The Act (Section 44) requires officers to exercise care, diligence and skills to ensure the PCBU (in this case the port) complies with its duty. The Act says that due diligence includes taking ‘reasonable steps’, as set out in column A of the table below. Note the use of the word ‘and’ at the end of each point – officer due diligence includes all of the matters.

Failure to exercise due diligence is a strict liability offence – an officer need not have acted recklessly or intentionally to be found in breach of the requirement.

In this situation, the Court noted, among other things, that the CEO had been put on notice regarding insufficient monitoring of ‘work as done’ in a report from KPMG and had not taken action to implement its recommendations.

The Court also noted that the CEO should have known there were shortcomings around the management of exclusion zones and should have addressed these in a timely manner.

What can officers do to help ensure they are exercising due diligence?

In column B we provide some suggestions for how an officer might exercise due diligence, including useful questions for officers to ask.

We do not suggest relying on this or any other industry guides – what due diligence constitutes is specific to the circumstances and the nature of the work. The court may consider industry standards and guidelines when determining if an officer has exercised due diligence, but this is not determinative.

Column A	Column B
(a) to acquire, and keep up to date, knowledge of work health and safety matters; and	How mature is the PCBU’s safety culture? What message does leadership send through its actions and words? Are we continuing to upskill our health and safety governance knowledge?
(b) to gain an understanding of the nature of the operations of the business or undertaking of the PCBU and generally of the hazards and risks associated with those operations; and	Know the business, what it involves, the tasks and how they are performed. What are the special health and safety implications for our work? Get expert advice on the hazards and risks.
(c) to ensure that the PCBU has available for use, and uses, appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise risks to health and safety from work carried out as part of the conduct of the business or undertaking; and	What policies and procedures are in place? How often are they reviewed and updated? What personal protective equipment is available? What training is provided?
(d) to ensure that the PCBU has appropriate processes for receiving and considering information regarding incidents, hazards, and risks and for responding in a timely way to that information; and	What health and safety monitoring is done, how often and by whom? Are ‘near misses’ recorded? What trends are emerging from the data?
(e) to ensure that the PCBU has, and implements, processes for complying with any duty or obligation of the PCBU under this Act; and	What action is taken following any near misses or incidents? How well do you understand the duties set out in the Act?
(f) to verify the provision and use of the resources and processes referred to in paragraphs (c) to (e).	What records are there to confirm that actions around health and safety?

What else can officers do in terms of health and safety?

Leaders set the tone from the top. When leaders demonstrate visible leadership in health and safety, it shows that it is an important part of the organisation’s culture.

Visible leadership includes more than just making and following rules. It means taking a genuine interest in how health and safety is managed and understanding and acting to remove any barriers to a safety culture. Officers should ask to visit the relevant PCBU and to speak to workers, to ask workers what is working well and what could be improved when it comes to safety.

They should also act in a timely manner to address any shortcomings in health and safety.

Resources

There are many resources available to help officers at all levels with health and safety governance, such as:

Institute of Directors Health and Safety Governance: A Good Practice Guide: https://www.iod.org.nz/resources-and-insights/guides-and-resources/health-and-safety-a-good-practice-guide#

Parry Field Lawyers Charities Healthcheck Part 3 People: https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Part-3_People_Charities-Healthcheck_PF.pdf

Worksafe – Health and safety leadership guide: for owners and company directors of small to medium businesses: https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/managing-health-and-safety/businesses/guidance-for-business-leaders/

This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please contact a qualified legal professional. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit to the source.

There are many reasons why a charity may wish to change its name; maybe the name is too similar to another organisation, or the name doesn’t easily get across what your charity is about. Maybe as time has gone on since you formed your charity, your purpose has changed, and you would like your name to reflect that.

Whatever the reason, it’s important to follow the correct process, let the appropriate services know, and are aware of potential implications of the change. It’s also important to note that the name change doesn’t affect the rights, obligations or liabilities of the board or committee. An organisation is bound by the commitments it makes regardless of a name change.

Note: Before changing your name, it is important to check that your name is not being used by another organisation, as you will be denied the new name if it is already taken. Onecheck is a great resource for this.

Who do I need to notify?

If you are an incorporated organisation it is important that you notify the Companies Office. If you are registered as a charity, it is important that you contact Charity Services and let them know too. This is to ensure that your details are publicly up to date on both registers.

If you are registered with both, you will have to apply for a name change with the Companies Office before you notify Charities Services.

It can also be useful to let your members or the public know of the name change, to ensure your community is kept up to date.

Note: We often see organisations wanting to use a te reo Māori name. We suggest consulting and getting advise on this as it is something that should be gifted (rather than using google translate!)

Updating your name through the Companies Office

If you’re updating your details online, you must have:

a RealMe login
an online services account with the Companies Office
authority to manage information for your charitable trust board.

If you do have the above, then you can change your organisation’s name following the below steps:

Log in to your online services account.
On the dashboard, select the charitable trust board you wish to update from ‘My Businesses’.
On the ‘View Details’ page, select the ‘General Details’ tab, and click the ‘Change Name’ button.
Enter the proposed new name, and to confirm it can be used, click ‘Name Availability Check’.
If you have documentation to support your application, click ‘Upload’ to attach documents. Please note, these documents will not be available for public view.
Complete the signatory details and click on ‘Submit’.

More information can be found here.

Updating your name through Charities Services

To update your name, simply login through the online portal and fill out the Update Details form online. You can also download and complete the paper form and send that in. Ensure that you have any information you may need on hand (for example if you are using the same name as another entity that will be wound up, ensure you have written consent). More information can be found here.

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please contact a qualified legal professional. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit to the source.

Succession planning is a critical component of effective governance for any board, whether it’s for a corporate entity, charity, or for-purpose organisation. In New Zealand, where governance practices are guided by both legal frameworks and best practice principles, succession planning ensures that a board remains dynamic, diverse, and capable of steering the organisation into the future. This article outlines some practical considerations to keep in mind when developing a succession plan for your board.

1. Primary Responsibility of the Current Board

Succession planning is one of the board’s most important responsibilities, ensuring continuity and stability during leadership transitions.

(a) Evaluating Leadership Roles

Start by assessing the current leadership. Who is your Chair and how long have they been in the role? It may be time to consider appointing a deputy Chair who can learn the ropes now and ensure a smooth transition when the time comes for the current Chair to step down. Planning ahead mitigates risks associated with abrupt leadership changes and maintains strategic continuity.

(b) Emphasising Diversity of Thought

When considering successors, resist the temptation to simply replicate the existing board members. Instead, focus on bringing in new perspectives. Diversity of thought fosters innovative solutions and more resilience. Actively seek out individuals who bring different experiences, skills, and viewpoints to the table. We have also created a Board Skills Matrix which you can access over here.

(c) Mapping Out a Succession Plan

A clear, structured succession plan is essential. Consider implementing a rotation schedule for trustees, this could be legally enshrined in your Trust Deed. For instance, a trustee might serve for a term of three years, renewable for another three years, with a maximum of three terms (3+3+3), after which they must stand down for at least a year. This ensures regular infusion of fresh ideas while maintaining experienced leadership.

(d) Encouraging Healthy Board Renewal

Term limits and rotation schedules naturally create opportunities for board renewal. These mechanisms facilitate necessary discussions about new leadership without making it personal. Focus these conversations on the organisation’s needs rather than individual preferences to prioritise the entity’s long-term success.

2. Utilising a Skills Matrix

A skills matrix is a valuable tool for evaluating the board’s current composition and identifying gaps in expertise or experience. This can be used to decide where there may be areas to bring people in on. By regularly updating the skills matrix, you can keep your board aligned with the evolving needs of the organisation. Here is ‘needs matrix’ example from SportNZ.

3. Long-Term Vision: “Where Will We Be in 50 Years?”

While succession planning often focuses on the near to medium term, it’s crucial to consider the long-term legacy of the current leadership. The question, “where will we be in 50 years?” encourages the board to think beyond immediate challenges, nurture potential leaders, anticipate future trend and position the board to respond to long-term challenges and opportunities.

4. Conclusion

Board succession planning is not just about filling seats—it’s about ensuring that the board remains effective, diverse, and forward-thinking. By taking a proactive approach, utilising tools like a skills matrix, and thinking long-term, your board can continue to provide strong governance that drives the organisation’s success for decades to come.

If you would like to listen to a short podcast on this topic, the Institute of Director’s have released an episode featuring a Chartered Fellow of the Institute of Directors here where Steven Moe (the host of the show) talks through governance and board considerations.

If you need assistance in developing a succession plan tailored to your board’s needs or have legal questions regarding governance, contact one of our experts at Parry Field Lawyers.

This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please contact a qualified legal professional. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit to the source.

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 (“Act”) has created new requirements that all incorporated societies must meet in order to reregister under the Act. The most relevant requirements that may prevent your Residents Association from reregistering under the Act are discussed below.

In January 2026, new regulations provided a temporary exemption for Residents Associations under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022. You can read more about this here.

Background

A Residents Association is a type of incorporated society that exists for the benefit of the community it serves. It might maintain community facilities or common areas, or simply serve as a forum for members to come together and organise community activities. Some Residents Associations will own common land as well.

Most Residents Associations will be registered under the Incorporated Societies Act 1908, which means that they will need to prepare for and reregister under the Incorporated Societies Act 2022. We have an Information Hub dedicated to the changes in the new Act and what organisations need to do in order to reregister – you can find it here.

There are some requirements under the new Act that may impact your Residents Association and your ability to reregister – here’s what you need to know.

Nominating a not-for-profit entity on wind up

Section 26 of the new Act sets out a list off requirements for what incorporated societies must include in their constitution. We have written a series of six articles on these requirements, which you can find on our Information Hub.

The key requirement for Residents Associations to be aware of is set out in section 26(1)(l). This explains that incorporated societies must nominate a not-for-profit entity (or a class or description of not-for-profit entities) to which any surplus assets are distributed to on liquidation or removal from the register. The definition of a not-for-profit entity is set out in section 5.

Generally, the members of Residents Associations are homeowners in the subdivision or community, so Residents Associations like this who hold land on behalf of members wouldn’t be able to distribute property to members under this provision on wind up.

This will cause issues for many Residents Associations who own common land, as the “winding up” provision will often say that any surplus assets should go to the members – that way the residents will each get a share in the land when the society winds up. If your Residents Association is in this situation just let us know – we are happy to support you in considering your options moving forward.

Purposes – can’t be for the financial gain of members

Under section 26(1)(b) of the new Act a society’s constitution must include its purpose. This makes a lot of sense and may not seem like an issue on the face of it, but the new Act also sets out that the Registrar may refuse to incorporate a society if its purposes are unlawful. An unlawful purpose includes where a society is carried on for the financial gain of any of its members. Section 23 of the new Act then explains that a society must be treated as having the purpose of being carried on for the financial gain of its members where:

it distributes, or may distribute, any gain, profit, surplus, dividend, or other similar financial benefit to any of its members (whether in money or in kind); or
it has, or may have, capital that is divided into shares or stock held by its members; or
it holds, or may hold, property in which its members have a disposable interest (whether directly, or in the form of shares or stock in the capital of the society or otherwise).

The most relevant clause to Residents Associations is the third provision. If the Residents Association’s assets are set to go to members on wind up, then those members would have a “disposable interest” in property. A clause such as this or any other clause in the constitution that suggests members should get the Residents Association’s assets would then be in breach of the new Act.

Section 24 of the new Act provides a list of examples of when a society does not have a financial gain purpose. We think that although some of these could be stretched to apply to Residents Associations, section 23(1)(c) is so clear that it would not make sense to interpret the new Act in that way.

What now?

As some Residents Associations won’t be able to reregister under the new Act with their current land ownership and constitutional structure, it’s time for each of these Residents Associations to consider their options moving forward. This is something we are well placed to advise on, as we regularly come alongside both incorporated societies and property holding organisations to consider their structure options.

If you believe your Residents Association may be unable to reregister under the Act due to the reasons above, please feel free to contact Judith Bullin or Sophie Tremewan at Parry Field Lawyers. Our team are more than happy to assist you to make the changes needed to reregister under the Act.

We help with unincorporated and incorporated societies and answer questions all the time. If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team.

The tax benefit of making donations: How does it work?

We help set up many charities and are often asked about the tax benefits. We go into this in our “Charities in New Zealand” book, but want to outline some key points here.

Charities benefit from receiving donations and donors often benefit from the ‘feel good factor’ of helping out worthy causes. Registered charities do not pay tax and their donors can benefit further by applying for a ‘tax credit’ to get a third back, either by applying directly to IRD or by way of ‘payroll giving’.

Direct donations

People often make donations to charities directly. The donor can then submit the receipt to IRD who will issue a ‘tax credit’, which effectively returns 33.3% of the donation to the donor. Find out more about claiming tax credits for direct donations.

What is payroll giving?

Payroll giving occurs when employers enable their employees to make donations directly from their gross wages. The tax benefit is that the amount of PAYE or withholding tax the employee pays is reduced by the amount of their donation. They also receive a ‘tax credit’ from the donation, which is 33.3% of the donation value.

Payroll giving is therefore a bit simpler as the donor does not have to submit their donation receipts to IRD to claim the tax credit.

What needs to be in place for payroll giving?

Employers will only be able to offer this service if they file their payroll taxes electronically. They can either use the myIR online service, or attach files from their own payroll software.

Even if an employer has the ability to use payroll giving, it is discretionary. Employers may also use their discretion to choose how the donations will operate, for example, they may designate specific charities that can be donated to, and they may designate a minimum donation amount.

Only ‘donee organisations’ can receive payroll donations.

What is a donee organisation?

IRD maintains a list of donee organisations. Charities are added to the list if they use at least 75% of their funds within New Zealand (that is, they operate “wholly or mainly” here), or for the public good if an organisation is not a charity. For more on the threshold, you can check to see if a charity is on the IRD donee organisation list here.

Other resources:

The IRD has put together this excellent guide to payroll giving.

It is also possible to claim tax credits on donations to charities supporting overseas causes.

We help with charity set ups and answering questions all the time. If you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team at Parry Field Lawyers

Background

What does the exemption mean for residents associations?

Time to consider an alternative structure?

Who do I need to notify?

Updating your name through the Companies Office

Updating your name through Charities Services

1. Primary Responsibility of the Current Board

(a) Evaluating Leadership Roles

(b) Emphasising Diversity of Thought

(c) Mapping Out a Succession Plan

(d) Encouraging Healthy Board Renewal

2. Utilising a Skills Matrix

3. Long-Term Vision: “Where Will We Be in 50 Years?”

4. Conclusion

Christchurch CBD

Christchurch – Riccarton

Rolleston

Hokitika

Auckland