• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Parry Field Lawyers
  • Home
  • About
    • Insights
    • Terms of Engagement
    • Testimonials
  • Our People
  • Services
    • Property Law
      • Residential Property
      • Property Construction
      • Commercial Property
        • Property Leasing
      • Subdivisions
      • Community Housing Information Hub
    • Advisory
      • Employment Hub
      • Sale and Purchase
      • Financing
      • Governance
      • Technology/ IT
    • Disputes
      • Court. Tribunals, Arbitrations
      • Estates and Wills
      • Divorce and Separation
      • Insurance
      • Employment Hub
      • Family
      • Company and Shareholding
      • Debt Collection
      • Construction
    • Trusts and Asset Planning
      • Wills and Enduring Powers of Attorney
      • Estates
      • Succession Planning and Asset Protection
      • Trust Management
    • Charities/For Purpose Organisations
      • Charities: Information Hub & Healthchecks
      • Governance Essentials
      • Incorporated Societies: Information Hub
      • Faith Groups: Information Hub
      • Impact Investing: Information Hub
      • Social Enterprises/Impact Companies
      • Start-ups and Capital Raising Hub
      • Schools & Education: Information Hub
    • Immigration and Migrants (移民)
      • Work Visas 工签
      • Family Visas 家庭签证
      • Skilled Migrants 技术移民
      • Business and Investment Visas 生意与投资签证
      • Potentially Prejudicial Information 回复移民局质疑 (PPI)
      • Employer Assistance 雇主协助
      • Overseas Investment 海外投资
  • Resources
    • Guides
    • Articles
    • Courses
      • Governance 101
    • Case Studies
    • Blog
      • Aotearoa Impact Sector Updates
    • Templates
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Terms and Conditions Including Software
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – One Way
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – Two Way
      • Independent Contractors Agreement
      • Shareholders’ Resolutions – Written resolution
      • Share Transfer
      • Incorporation – First Shareholder Resolutions
      • Incorporation – First Directors’ Resolutions
    • Videos
      • COVID-19 and Commercial Leases
      • Force Majeure” clauses in Contracts and COVID-19
      • Property sale and purchases and COVID-19
      • Seeds Podcast
  • Careers
    • Summer Clerk Programme
  • Contact
    • Healthcheck
  • Pay Online
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Preliminary Decisions in Employment Dismissals – Are they required?

Employment

It is well established in New Zealand’s employment law that there are certain things employers must do prior to justifiably dismissing an employee.  These things fall into two categories, having a justified reason and following a fair process.  It is not unusual to find cases where an employee’s dismissal is found by the Employment Relations Authority or Employment Court to be unjustified, not because there was no basis to take action against an employee but because the employer’s process was significantly flawed.

For example, in some cases, employers who haven’t sufficiently investigated allegations or given their employee a fair opportunity to explain their side of things, have been found to have breached proper process, which has ultimately resulted in the ERA determining that their dismissal of an employee was unjustified.

However, if an employer has carried out a fair process and ultimately reached a decision to dismiss, are they also required to tell their employee their preliminary decision and give them the chance to feed back on the same, prior to making a final decision?

While there is no obligation in the Employment Relations Act to do so, increasingly preliminary decisions are now seen as best practice, namely employers should provide a preliminary decision to their employees, including all details of any proposed disciplinary action, and allow their employees to give their feedback.

This helps ensure that the employee has had a full opportunity to comment on all relevant matters before a decision is finalised, which not only reduces risks to the employer (for example, they may have misunderstood something the employee said, which might change the employer’s decision) but also promotes good faith between the parties.  Further, it enables the employer to think through their decision and the basis for it, in advance of taking final action, which is then binding on them.

If a preliminary decision is given however, it must not indicate that the employer has already made up their mind, as that will not constitute a genuine opportunity for the employee to provide feedback, including potentially changing the employer’s decision.  In other words, it should convey that the decision is preliminary only and the employer will consider all feedback provided by the employee on it before deciding whether to proceed with the decision or not.  Further, the employer must fully and genuinely consider the employee’s feedback on the preliminary decision before either confirming that decision or advising of a changed decision (such as to only issue a final warning, rather than to dismiss the employee).

In summary, we recommend that, once an investigation (into say misconduct) has concluded and a preliminary decision has been reached:

  • this should initially be sent to an employee in the form of a preliminary decision letter, with the option given to either choose whether the employee’s feedback is provided in writing or in person.
  • a reasonable amount of time is given to the employee between the preliminary decision being provided and feedback being due (this will be fact dependent but usually no less than 24 hours).
  • sufficient time is taken to genuinely consider the feedback, once it is received, prior to making a final decision (again this will be fact specific).

If you require any assistance regarding starting a disciplinary process or advice in respect of making a preliminary decision, please do not hesitate to contact our employment team.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and you should consult your lawyer about your specific situation. Please feel free to contact us at Parry Field Lawyers:

  • Hannah Carey, Senior Counsel – hannahcarey@parryfield.com
https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/IMG_20210219_190611-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Kylie Shipley https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Parry-Field-Lawyers-Logo.png Kylie Shipley2022-07-14 14:33:252023-04-21 18:34:51Preliminary Decisions in Employment Dismissals – Are they required?

Christchurch CBD

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 60 Cashel Street
Christchurch 8013, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 744
Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

Christchurch

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
1 Rimu Street, Riccarton,
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Rolleston

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 80 Rolleston Drive,
Rolleston, 7614, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Hokitika

PHONE: +64 3 755 8673
FAX: +64 3 755 8073

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
127 – 137 Revell Street,
Hokitika 7810, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 44,
Hokitika 7842, New Zealand

Parry Field Charitable Foundation

Parry Field charitable members of NZ LAw, Global Cross Legal and SCLA

© Copyright – Parry Field Lawyers     |     Privacy Policy

Contractor vs Employee: The Grey ZoneIncorporated Societies vs Charitable Trusts
Scroll to top