Charities/NFP - Parry Field Lawyers

Charitable trusts have a long history of supporting those in need. Yet those in charge of decisions about how to use funds should be cautious to ensure that any giving does not create a private gain or financial benefit to an individual. Failure to give in accordance with the permitted charitable purposes can mean a charity may lose its registered status.

To illustrate this it is good to look at a practical example. In 2014, the Charities Registration Board determined that the New Zealand Affordable Art Trust no longer qualified for registration as a charitable entity. The Board found that the Trust’s primary purpose was to promote the private interests of artists. This was outside the scope of charity as it conferred private benefits on artists which were more than incidental to any charitable purpose.

The Trust submitted that its support of artists fell under the ‘relief of poverty’ charitable purpose. This argument was rejected as the Trust chose to assist artists based on criteria such as originality, technique and development, rather than the relative wealth or poverty of the artist. The Board did acknowledge that the Trust helped to advance education in the arts for the general public, however this was not the main focus of the Trust.

A similar approach has been found in the courts. In Commissioners of Inland Revenue v White, Fox J held:

The promotion or advancement of industry (including a particular industry such as agriculture) or of commerce is a charitable object provided that the purpose is the advancement of the benefit of the public at large and not merely the promotion of the interest of those engaged in the manufacture and sale of their particular products. The charitable nature of the object of promoting a particular industry depends upon the existence of a benefit to the public from the promotion of the object.

At the risk of providing too much detail, Lord Simonds, when considering the question of whether an element of public benefit is necessary to achieve charitable status in Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd said:

My Lords, once more your Lordships have to consider the difficult subject of charitable trusts … It is a clearly established principle of the law of charity that a trust is not charitable unless it is directed to the public benefit. This is sometimes stated in the proposition that it must benefit the community or a section of the community. Negatively it is said that a trust is not charitable if it confers only private benefits. In the recent case of Gilmour v Coats [1949] AC 448 this principle was reasserted. It is easy to state and has been stated in a variety of ways, the earliest statement that I can find being in Jones v Williams (1767) 2 Amb 651, in which Lord Hardwicke, LC, is briefly reported as follows: ‘Definition of charity: a gift to a general public use, which extends to the poor as well as to the rich …’With a single exception, to which I shall refer, this applies to all charities. We are apt now to classify them by reference to Lord MacNaughten’s division in Income Tax Commissioners v Pemsel [1891] AC 531, and, as I have elsewhere pointed out, it was at one time suggested that the element of public benefit was not essential except for charities falling within the fourth class, ‘other purposes beneficial to the community’. This is certainly wrong except in the anomalous case of trusts for the relief of poverty with which I must specifically deal. In the case of trusts for educational purposes the condition of public benefit must be satisfied. The difficulty lies in determining what is sufficient to satisfy the test, and there is little to help your Lordships to solve it.

What does this mean for charities?

Charitable trusts should ensure that any benefit they bestow are intended to create a benefit for the public. While a private benefit incidental to a charitable public benefit may be allowed, this should not be the primary focus if a trust wishes to maintain its charitable status.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and you should contact your lawyer about your specific situation. We would be happy to assist you in your journey. Please feel free to contact Steven Moe at stevenmoe@parryfield.com should you require assistance.

Are physical signatures necessary when executing legal documents?

Not always. The rules are found in the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA). The core principle is that a signature must be RELIABLE in order to have any legal effect. In determining whether the signature you have provided is reliable, the questions are:

Does the signature adequately identify you?
Does it indicate your approval of the information in the document?
Given the nature of the transaction, is the means by which your signature was provided (physical or electronic) appropriate?

An electronic method must satisfy the first two aspects above in order to be recognised as an “electronic signature” in New Zealand. Generally, an electronic signature is presumed to be reliable provided:

1. The means of creating the electronic signature is:

(a) linked only to the signatory;

(b) under the control of the signatory alone; and

2. Any alterations to either the signature or the information in the document, is detectable.

However, this presumption may be overturned if the electronic signature is held not to be ‘as reliable as is appropriate’ given the purpose and circumstances in which the signature is being required. This is very much a fact-specific determination that will depend on the context of each situation. It is suggested that the following factors be considered:

the size of the transaction (i.e. the level of risk e.g. documents involving large sums);
how often you transact with the other party concerned; and
whether the other party (and yourself) often enters into the sort of agreement represented by the document.

Practical examples of these principles

Below are some case law examples that help illustrate the standard:

Wilfred v Lexington Legal Ltd

An electronic signature (in the form of an email from a client to their lawyer signing “best regards — Harmon”) sufficed as being a reliable for the purposes of entering into a contract for legal services.

Company Net Ltd v Registrar of Companies

Original signatures were required by the Registrar of Companies in relation to company incorporation documents — albeit in this case, there were issues of identifiability that caused concern. The companies office makes clear that they do accept electronic signatures for most documents.

See: https://companies-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz/help-centre/managing-your-online-account/filing-documents-with-electronic-signatures/

Welsh v Gatchell

Agreements for sale and purchases of land can be signed electronically. Notice to the other party about electronic signatures is already provided in the standard terms of the Auckland District Law Society document which is commonly used for these types of transactions.

Consequently, although electronic signatures will generally be considered reliable, where there is a lot riding on a particular document (i.e. a sizeable transaction as opposed to a mere box ticking activity), it appears prudent to require physical signatures. Where physical signatures pose significant inconvenience and you wish to sign electronically, we advise that you give express notice to the other party that an electronic signature will bind all parties to the contents of the document, and that you expressly specify the form of electronic signature required.

What documents can be signed electronically?

As noted above, documents can be signed electronically as long as the signatory is identifiable and the signature is reliable. However, there are two main caveats to this:

Legal Requirement

Where there is a legal requirement on you to give information to a person (thus requiring your signature), you must obtain that person’s consent to receiving the information through means of electronic signature.

Documents of Integrity

Electronic signatures have no effect on documents that concern “matters of integrity” such as:

Documents relating to citizenship, elections, fish and game, civil aviation, corrections, credit contracts and consumer finance, disabled persons community welfare, fisheries, medicine regulations, misuse of drugs, passports, and court procedural documents;
Documents that relate to affidavits, statutory declarations, documents given on oath or affirmation;
Powers of attorney and enduring powers of attorney, Wills, codicils and the like;
Negotiable instruments;
Bills of lading;
Warrants to enter, search or seize; and
Fair Trading Act 1986 provisions in relation to consumer standards information on goods or services, and products or safety standards.

Is it sufficient to provide electronic pdf versions of the signed documents or are originals always required?

The inclusion of a counterparts clause in documents allows parties to exchange pdf copies of signed agreements through email or fax. The party last to sign the document effects a binding contract upon their provision of the signed document to the other party/parties. It is common practice for physical signatures to be exchanged in this manner i.e. physical signature presented in electronic form/through electronic means will suffice.

The absence of a counterparts clause in the document itself however means that wet-ink physical signatures will be required. A signature may be deemed unreliable where it is performed in a manner that wasn’t agreed to between the parties as evidenced in the document.

Provision of the originally signed documents is also required when executing deeds. Section 10 of the Property Law Act 2007 requires a signed deed to be delivered in order to take effect. Delivery is commonly understood as being the physical handing over of documents either in person or through post. If the intention is to effect delivery otherwise, we advise that this be made clear in the document itself by recording that the deed shall be deemed delivered upon transmission of a scanned copy of the original executed document by one party to the other.

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

Interested in pursuing a purpose or cause that benefits the community? The type of vehicle you use is critical in ensuring your efforts are effective and that any assets you hold are protected.

Charitable Trusts and Incorporated Societies are two common vehicles used in New Zealand that often cause much confusion. We provide a short summary outlining the benefits and drawbacks of each option below:

Incorporated Society

Governed by the Incorporated Societies Act 2022 unless a society is yet to reregister under the new Act.
Usually used by sports clubs, cultural groups, etc. that see benefit in wider involvement.
Members can come and go without affecting the vehicle’s identity.
Membership: Minimum number of 10 members required (Body Corporate members do however count as three (3) individuals).
Accountability: committee members (officers) are accountable to the members.
Administration costs: annual financial statements must be filed and annual general meetings held.
Control: democratic control of the vehicle and its activities by its members. Inefficiency may result if majority of the members hinder the society’s purposes. There are some stories of members ousting officers but in our experience this would be very rare.

Charitable Trust

Governed by the Charitable Trusts Act 1957/ Trust Act 2019.
We recommend at least three trustees or an odd number to prevent conflict.
Accountability: individuals (a.k.a trustees) need to operate in accordance with the trust’s deed or be held personally liable for breaching their duties as trustees.
Administration costs: proper records required for activities undertaken, etc. Trustees must meet regularly to make decisions as required by the trust deed.
Control: decisions are made by a select few which may mean greater stability and efficiency. Conflict between the trustees however could adversely affect the performance of the trust. As trustees appoint each other, the ability to change hands of controlling power may be difficult.

Various factors must be considered before committing to a vehicle. We generally find that a Charitable Trust is the most flexible of the two. However, it is important that you consider how your operations are likely to look like. Imagine the future. Will your vehicle advance or hinder your ability to effect your purpose?

Our team is experienced with charities, social enterprises and trusts that are common in this area of law. We would be happy to assist you in your journey. We have free resources including our Charities Legal Handbook. For more information, please feel free to contact us at Parry Field Lawyers.

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

What the key change actually entails

If an organisation applies more than 25% of its funds for the benefit of overseas purposes, then it may no longer be considered to be operating ‘wholly or mainly’ in New Zealand and could lose its tax donee organisation status. The reason this may impact on charities you advise is that some charities have traditionally sent significant amounts overseas to support works there (disaster relief, orphanages, aid workers etc). It is possible that religious organisations in particular who support people overseas may already be at, or close to, the new threshold, and be unaware of the changes. It could cause them problems in the future if they continue to operate in the same way.

If you’re a lawyer advising a client who does send funds overseas, it would be important to advise them about the new approach.

The key provision itself

The section relevant in the Interpretation Statement 18/05 and related fact sheet is the Income Tax Act 2017 section LD 3(2)(a) which sets out the meaning of a charitable or other public benefit gift. The type of entity that qualifies is:

“a society, institution, association, organisation, or trust that is not carried on for the private pecuniary profit of an individual, and whose funds are applied wholly or mainly to charitable, benevolent, philanthropic, or cultural purposes within New Zealand.”

In clarifying what these definitions mean – “within New Zealand,” means the purposes are what is looked at, rather than the location where funds are spent. “Wholly or mainly” – will mean “75% or more” of funds being applied in New Zealand. Lastly, “funds are applied,” means action of sorts needs to be taken by the organisation to either spend or accumulate the funds.

The Interpretation Statement has been issued to clarify what entities qualify as a donee organisation under that section.

The “safe harbour exception”

There will be some flexibility in how the percentages will work. An organisation can choose a method to calculate a “safe harbour percentage.” The key steps involved in doing this is to calculate the total funds and then divide that by the amount spent for specified purposes within New Zealand to get the percentage.

If in any year the safe harbour of 75% is not met then IRD can also look at the two preceding years. The purpose of this is to allow for some one off exceptions. It does this by looking at the cumulative figures over the three years. This means that the current year might be at say 70% but the previous two years were respectively at 80% and 90%. By looking at the cumulative total the percentage over the last three years might average 80%. IRD provides some key examples on the guidance of this, see here.

Another option for those sending funds overseas

Schedule 32 of the Income Tax Act 2007 could provide another exception to this new interpretation. If you are a lawyer with a client who will no longer meet the threshold proposed due to the significant funds applied overseas, this provides another option to them.

Applying to be added to Schedule 32 of the Income Tax Act 2007 can give qualifying charities a unique status in the New Zealand tax regime. Schedule 32 status is only granted to a select few (full list here). It provides the ability for those organisation to issue receipts to their donees for donations made to the charity even if applied wholly for overseas purposes.

At times the Government had a flood of requests and even published special guidelines to charities on how to make the application. For those charities that do not have their charitable purposes principally (more than 75%) in New Zealand, then the charity cannot qualify as a donee organisation unless it is listed in Schedule 32.

When applying to be listed under Schedule 32, it is the purposes for which funds are applied which is the most critical point. This may be different to where you spend the money. For example, buying toys in New Zealand to send to children in third world countries would mean that the purposes are overseas, not in New Zealand.

Furthermore, there are other hurdles to be aware of if applying for Schedule 32 status.

The process for applying is long and arduous and IRD has to put a special request to Cabinet for final approval and these happen only once or twice a year.
The purpose of the overseas charity is also important. When applying, Cabinet will want to see that the charity’s purpose falls within these three humanitarian categories; “the relief of poverty, hunger, sickness, or the ravages of war or natural disaster; or the economy of developing countries; or raising the educational standards of a developing country.” Advancement of religion and political advocacy is thus not noted in this list.
You must “tell the story” of your charity, specifically focusing on who the trustees are, what they are involved in and how the charity purposes are being practically carried out. Furthermore, there must be evidence that the New Zealand trustees regularly visit any overseas offices and an audit of the money raised.

Why is this an important change

If someone makes a donation above $5 to a donee organisation they receive a refundable tax credit/income tax deduction. This encourages people to give to organisations that qualify. If an organisation does not have tax donee status then it will be more difficult to solicit donations.

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

Section 5(2A) of the Charities Act 2005 states that “the promotion of amateur sport may be a charitable purpose if it is the means by which a charitable purpose referred to in subsection (1) is pursued”. So, what sports actually meet these criteria for a charitable purpose?

The purpose of section 5(2A) is to ensure that the promotion of a sport can be a charitable purpose. While promoting a sport is not in itself a charitable purpose, the purpose of a charity could include the promotion of a particular sport for the purposes of promoting health or for the advancement of education, as is established in the section.

Recently, after six years of Swimming NZ being a registered charity, the Charities Registration Board decided to de-register it. The reasoning behind this was that it no longer had charitable purposes due to the competitive and elite nature of the high performance programme. This in itself does not promote a sport but instead promotes sporting success which does not benefit the public. They decided that while there was some promotion to health, the focus on promoting success in the sport outweighed this.

The impact of this decision by the Charities Registration Board is that sporting organisations set up as charities will need to prove that they are existing to promote health as opposed to promoting success in the sport, and ultimately be benefiting the public.

An article which discusses this in more detail was posted by the New Zealand Law Society and can be found here.

So, to answer the question above, any sport can meet the criteria for a charitable purpose as long as it relates to the promotion of health, the advancement of education or anything else that proves to be beneficial to the community, and it will need to be able to prove that it does continue to promote these.

The Charities Services website provides a helpful overview on this topic which can be found and here.

We offer legal advice on all aspects of charitable trusts and are happy to answer any questions that you might have. Contact Steven Moe at stevenmoe@parryfield.com or 03-348-8480 for more information.

Trustee Duties

The Trustees have certain duties and liabilities placed on them under the relevant Trust Deed, New Zealand Legislation and Common Law (decisions of the Courts in New Zealand and Overseas). These duties include:

knowing the trust deed, the trust assets and liabilities;
advancing charitable purposes;
fiduciary duties of honesty and loyalty and acting in the best interests of the trust;
exercising care, skill and prudent diligence;
acting impartially amongst beneficiaries’
selling wasting property;
exercising reasonable care;
insuring assets and keep property safe;
keeping inventories;
investing within a reasonable time;
repairing trust property;
investing prudently;
not delegating;
acting jointly where there is more than one trustee;
not profiting from trust property;
being accountable; and
being honest, loyal, diligent and prudent in carrying out the terms of the trust.

If you would like further explanation of any of these duties, please get in touch with us.

Generally, a charitable trust will have between 3 to 7 trustees. Usually, trustees are a mix of professional executives and non-executives. They will be held to the same standard of care in their actions as applies to directors of a business (there is not a lower standard due to it being a charitable trust).

Trustee Liability

Trustees are representatives of the Trust. As noted above when discussing duties, they act as fiduciaries who hold the trust property for the benefit of the charitable purpose set out in the deed. It is important that trustees clearly understand what those purposes are and do not overreach and act in a way that is further than what was set out in the deed. If trustees fail to perform their duties then they may be subject to proceedings taken out by interested persons. Ultimately, the New Zealand Attorney General has certain rights as the ultimate power ensuring accountability. It is common for trust deeds to include some limits on trustee liability. However, as mentioned before it is possible that trustees will be jointly and severally liable where a trust fails to account for GST, ACC levies or PAYE payments.

This article is the second in a series on charitable trusts. To have a look at our first article which sets out the advantages and disadvantages of charitable trusts, click here.

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

Requirements for a Charitable Trust

At the very least, a charitable trust must:

– have a charitable purpose;
– have trustees to administer the trust;
– have a registered address in New Zealand;
– be internally managed by a trust deed;
– keep a record of trustee meetings through minutes and resolutions; and
– keep proper financial records.

Annual returns and Auditing

A charitable trust will be required to submit annual returns that vary in requirements depending on the tier of charity. This varies as follows:

– Tier 1: Over $30 million expenditure;
– Tier 2: Under $30 million expenditure;
– Tier 3: Under $2 million annual expenses; or
– Tier 4: Under $125,000 annual operating expenses.

Regarding the auditing of accounts, if the total operating expenditure for the last two accounting periods was:

– over $500,000 – financial statements must be either audited or reviewed by a qualified auditor; or
– over $1 million – financial statements must be audited by a qualified auditor.

Charities Services

After your trust board is incorporated, you may apply to Charities Services to register as a charity. Once you are registered with Charities Services you will engage with them in relation to ongoing compliance requirements such as annual reports and notifying changes. The following areas need to be updated if there are changes:

– the name of the charity;
– a change in the officers;
– the rules;
– the address for service;
– the purposes of the charity; and
– the balance date.

These changes can be made online rather than by filing paper forms.

Every situation is unique so please discuss your situation with a professional advisor who can provide tailored solutions to you. We offer advice on all aspects of charitable trusts and are happy to answer any questions that you might have. Contact Steven Moe at stevenmoe@parryfield.com or 03-348-8480 for more information.

What is a Charitable Trust?

In New Zealand a common form that a charity will take is a charitable trust. These are used where there is not a “profit” motive for private gain for an individual from the activities of the trust. The regulator is both Charities Services (which registers charities if they meet legal criteria under the Charities Act 2005) and the Registrar of Incorporated Societies (which approves the incorporation of the trust boards under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957).

A registered charitable trust has the following key features:

– it is a separate legal entity;
– the liability of trustees is limited if the trust board has been incorporated;
– there is some cost involved in establishing the trust as certain documents are required but there is no cost to registering it; and
– there are ongoing reporting and administrative requirements.

Some Advantages

1. Separate Legal Entity

A charitable trust board which has been incorporated is a separate legal entity which can contract with others. A settlor (sometimes called donor) is needed to provide the initial amount which is how the trust is created (this is often a nominal figure such as $10).

2. Limited Liability

The liability of trustees is limited if the trust board has been incorporated. It is also common for a trust to provide indemnities for its trustees and officers and to take out insurance. Note, however, that trustees will be personally jointly and severably liable for certain taxes (GST, ACC levies, PAYE).

3. National Registration

New Zealand does not have a state-based system like Australia, so when a charitable trust has been registered by Charities Services that is a national registration.

4. Purposes are Restrictive

A charity in New Zealand must act to further its purposes which are set out in a trust deed. To be accepted as a registered charity those purposes must be charitable as defined in New Zealand law (which includes advancing religion). The charity cannot distribute funds or assets for the private gain of any individuals.

5. Powers of Trustees

Trustees can have a wide range of powers depending on how they are written in the Trust Deed. They can include matters such as use of funds, purchasing property, accepting money and carrying on a business.

Some Disadvantages

1. Establishment Costs

A charitable trust has some costs involved to set it up (usually more than $2,000.00 NZD). A lawyer will likely be involved to make sure that the purposes are charitable according to New Zealand law. They can also provide ongoing advice on the trust’s ongoing regulatory and filing requirements.

2. Disclosure and Reporting Requirements

A registered charity will have reporting requirements which can vary depending on their size (there are four tiers). There are financial reporting and auditing obligations on registered charities.

The information contained in this outline is of a general nature, should only be used as a guide and does not amount to legal advice. It should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice or as a basis for formulating decisions. Special considerations apply to individual fact situations. Before acting, clients should consult their Parry Field Lawyer.

What the key change actually entails

The key provision itself

The “safe harbour exception”

Another option for those sending funds overseas

Why is this an important change

Trustee Duties

Trustee Liability

What is a Charitable Trust?

Some Advantages

Some Disadvantages

Christchurch CBD

Christchurch – Riccarton

Rolleston

Hokitika

Auckland