• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Parry Field Lawyers
  • Home
  • About
    • News
    • Terms of Engagement
  • Our People
  • Services
    • Property
      • Residential
      • Construction
      • Subdivisions
      • Commercial
      • Leasing
    • Advisory
      • Employment
      • Sale & Purchases
      • Financing
      • Governance
      • Technology/IT
      • Capital Raising
    • Disputes
      • Employment
      • Court, Tribunals and Arbitrations
      • Estates & Wills
      • Divorce & Separation
      • Insurance
      • Family
      • Company & Shareholding
      • Debt Collection
      • Construction
    • Trusts & Asset Planning
      • Wills & Enduring Powers of Attorney
      • Estates
      • Succession Planning
    • Charities/For Purpose Organisations
      • Incorporated Societies: Information Hub
      • Charities: Information Hub
      • Faith Based Groups: Information Hub
      • Impact Investing: Information Hub
      • Hybrid Solutions: Charity/Business
      • Not for Profits
      • Churches
      • Sports Groups
      • Social Enterprises/Impact Companies
      • Community Groups
    • Immigration
      • Work Visas
      • Family Visas
      • Skilled Migrants
      • Business and Investment Visas
      • Potentially Prejudicial Information
      • Employer Assistance
      • Overseas Investment
  • Resources
    • Guides
      • Capital Raising Guide
      • Resources for the Incorporated Societies Act 2022
      • Doing Business In New Zealand
      • Start Ups Legal Toolkit
      • Buying & Selling Property
      • Charities In New Zealand
      • Social Enterprises in New Zealand Handbook
      • Family Trusts
      • Death & Estates
      • Churches Handbook
      • COVID-19 Legal Handbook
    • Articles
      • Heat of the moment resignations – do employees need to be given a chance to cool off?
      • The new Incorporated Societies Act 2022: When will the new Act affect my Society?
      • Racial Harassment in the Workplace
      • Built up annual leave – does an employee have to use it?
      • Resources for the Incorporated Societies Act 2022
      • When can a Trustee delegate their powers?
      • Buying your first home: Key issues (a practical guide from a first home buyer)
      • The new Incorporated Societies Act 2022: What it means for your Incorporated Society
      • The Addington Farm: A case study in setting up a Charity
      • The Bright-Line Test
      • Funds that advance charity: How do they work? 
      • What is a LIM?
      • Charity Founders’ Ongoing Relationship With The Charity They Start: Key points to know
    • Blog
    • Templates
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Terms and Conditions Including Software
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – One Way
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – Two Way
      • Independent Contractors Agreement
      • Shareholders’ Resolutions – Written resolution
      • Share Transfer
      • Incorporation – First Shareholder Resolutions
      • Incorporation – First Directors’ Resolutions
    • Videos
      • COVID-19 and Commercial Leases
      • Force Majeure” clauses in Contracts and COVID-19
      • Property sale and purchases and COVID-19
      • Seeds Podcast
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Healthcheck
  • Pay Online
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Is your trust at risk?

Trusts & Asset Planning

Is your Trust at risk?

 Do you have a trust that was set up years ago and think it is still protecting your assets?  In the recent case of Clayton v Clayton the traditional view of trusts and their ability to be challenged was turned on its head.  It may pay to check the wording used that grants powers in your own trust because if it is too wide then that could result in the ownership of the trust property itself being called into question.  Recent estimates have suggested up to 100,000 trusts could be at risk of challenge in New Zealand. 

 The key issue which was the subject of the case was the power that Mr Clayton had over the future of the trust.  Effectively he could control who received the trust’s assets because he was the only trustee and held all the significant powers.  After 17 years of marriage Mr Clayton and Mrs Clayton separated and she effectively argued that the powers Mr Clayton had in the Trust meant that the Trust assets were “property” for the purpose of the Property Relationships Act.  This meant that those assets would be split 50/50.  This was very important because the business Mr Clayton ran had grown significantly during their 17 years of marriage and the Trust property was significant.

 That situation may seem extreme – most trusts will have more than one trustee or at least a sharing or separation of powers – but it does highlight the ability of the court to call into question how trust property will be treated.  Would the situation be so different if the original Settlor of the Trust retains the power to appoint and remove trustees whenever they want and thereby exercises control over who the trustees decide should benefit from the Trust assets?  We don’t yet know but it seems likely that this point will be tested soon enough in the courts. 

 The implication for those who have a trust is clear.  Pull out that old trust document and have a look at the powers.  If one person has a great deal of control then it might be worth discussing with your lawyer to see if the wording should be tightened up to make it less likely for the courts to call it into question.  At the same time it is also worth considering if the Trust needs other changes or confirm that it is still as you originally intended.  Also, have you prepared a Memorandum of Wishes for your Trust which will provide guidance about how its assets are to be distributed?  Finally, this may also be a timely reminder to check other documents that are kept somewhere in a cupboard or drawer, like your will. 

 The old saying goes, “you cannot have your cake and eat it too” and this, surprisingly, might now be a point that is relevant to Trust law.  Perhaps the case of Clayton will result in a much needed dusting off of Trust and other documents and a refreshing of them to reflect current situations.  We are already seeing many of our clients express a desire to know more about what the implications of Clayton will be and we are happy to discuss your specific situation in detail. 

https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/sea-4373364_1920.jpg 1280 1920 Leigh Gray https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Parry-Field-Lawyers-Logo.png Leigh Gray2016-07-04 21:34:132020-06-12 16:59:48Is your trust at risk?

Christchurch CBD

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 60 Cashel Street
Christchurch 8013, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 744
Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

Christchurch

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
1 Rimu Street, Riccarton,
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Rolleston

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 80 Rolleston Drive,
Rolleston, 7614, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Hokitika

PHONE: +64 3 755 8673
FAX: +64 3 755 8073

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
26 Weld Street,
Hokitika 7810, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 44,
Hokitika 7842, New Zealand

Parry Field Charitable Foundation

Parry Field charitable members of NZ LAw, Global Cross Legal and SCLA

© Copyright – Parry Field Lawyers     |     Privacy Policy

Top Tips – Buying a House – What you need to knowTop Tips – Employing Staff in New Zealand
Scroll to top