Background

Since 19 September 2022, applications for Investor 1 and Investor 2 visa categories were replaced by a new category: the Active Investor Plus Visa (“AIP Visa”). New Zealand Trade and Enterprise (“NZTE”) has published guidance about the eligibility and what are acceptable investments under the new Visa. The guide was set up to explain this investment program, and to assist deal makers and capital raisings who hope to have deals or funds approved as acceptable investments.

The Government’s aim is to attract experienced and high-value investors to encourage greater economic benefit to New Zealand companies and the economy. The AIP Visa allows experienced investors to add to opportunities for companies and start-ups. You get points toward your visa if you are willing to invest in companies here.

An investor must also have a reasonable command of English to qualify for an AIP Visa (a minimum of Level 5 under the International English Language Testing System or the equivalent). As explained in our article Immigration Changes Overview, “acceptable investments” for an AIP Visa are made between NZ $5 million and $15 million. Different investments carry different weightings for the purposes of an AIP Visa application.

Direct investments

These are direct investments into businesses, and they receive the highest weighting of 3x (every $1 invested counting as $3 towards their visa conditions). In this case, an investment of only $5 million is required.

To qualify as a direct investment, some conditions must be met:

  1. Firstly, a direct investment is an investment in a New Zealand resident entity and privately owned business;
  2. An application for approval may be made either before the AIP Visa applicant makes the investment (classified as a current direct investment), or retrospectively (classified as a historical direct investment);
  3. NZTE will consult an external advisory panel which helps them to determine whether the direct investment meets the AIP Visa eligibility criteria; and
  4. For each direct investment, you must apply and receive and approval letter from NZTE for such direct investment to qualify.

There is no cost to apply for approval as an acceptable direct investment and any decision made by NZTE is final.

 

Indirect investments

A. Acceptable managed funds

Investments into private funds, such as private equity or venture capital funds are also upweighted but only 2x and an amount of $7.5 million is required (every $1 an investor invests into managed funds, counts as $2 towards their visa conditions).

To qualify as an acceptable managed fund, additional conditions apply :

  1. The fund has to be a New Zealand resident, entity which means:
    • Be incorporated in New Zealand;
    • Have its head office in New Zealand;
    • Have its centre of management in New Zealand; and
    • Have control, by company directors, exercised in New Zealand.
  2. It must meet the criteria in the AIP Visa Immigration New Zealand Instructions. The applicant should provide:
    • Evidence of incorporation in New Zealand from the New Zealand Companies Office;
    • Evidence that the fund manager will be registered on the New Zealand Financial Services Providers Register (per Appendix 15 of the Immigration Instructions);
    • The full legal names and addresses of current directors;
    • A summary of the fund’s background, proposed activities, status, target fund size. It should contain details about how the Managed Fund supports New Zealand being a responsible member of the world community, and demonstrates that the Managed Fund will not invest in anything which may prejudice New Zealand’s reputation;
    • An overview of the investment thesis of the Managed Investment. The application form must detail how the Managed Fund will deliver on the requirements for actual or potential growth of investee entities and/or their contribution to positive social and economic impacts for New Zealand; and
    • A summary of any social, environmental or governance (ESG) policies applicable to the organisation.
  3. Submit an application using the NZTE Investment forms;
  4. Be assessed as an acceptable investment and be added to the Acceptable Managed Fund list maintained and published by NZTE;
  5. Pay the application fee of $1,500 NZD (GST inclusive) per application;
  6. Once the application is submitted, NZTE will provide an invoice for this charge via email.

To qualify as an eligible recipient of Indirect Investment, the applicants must be a New Zealand resident entity that invests in private New Zealand businesses, with no investment in listed equities and/or fixed income assets such as bonds.

NZTE considers whether the Managed funds invests wholly or substantially in entities with a New Zealand connection. A minimum of 70% of the net committed capital must be made available for the investment in entities with a New Zealand connection.

An external advisory panel makes recommendations to NZTE on whether the Managed Fund investments are acceptable. The panel sits monthly and the dates are published online.

Annual re-certification is required to maintain an “Acceptable Managed Fund” status. NZTE will notify any approved managed fund when annual re-certification is required.

 Property is not an acceptable investment, however it can be 20% or less of an exchange traded fund or managed fund’s total assets.

 B. Listed equities and philanthropy

These investments (such as investment in NZX listed companies) do not receive an additional weighting, and each are capped at 50% of the $15m investment requirement. An investor could meet the required investment amount by investing $7.5m into listed equities and $7.5m into eligible philanthropic causes.

Key time periods to consider are:

  • The minimum investment period: the investor should invest across three years and maintain the investment for a further fourth year;
  • The minimum time required in NZ: the investor should spend 117 days in New Zealand across the four-year conditional visa period, or around a month a year; and
  • Despite these requirements, New Zealand is still quite restrictive on home ownership and processing times. It means investing with this sort of wealth might look elsewhere.

We support investors moving to New Zealand so if you would like to discuss further, please contact one of our team at stevenmoe@parryfield.comrebeccanicholson@parryfield.com or yangsu@parryfield.com at Parry Field Lawyers.

Kia ora All,

How are you?  We are cruising towards the middle of the year and in this email wanted to give lots of free content, some updates on Impact Sector events, training, seeds and more – this email goes to 764 of you and should give a little insight into what I am up to!  Feel free to forward it on to add value to others, and if you received this after being sent the email, just let me know if you would like to be added to the list.

Last week attended the largest governance conference in New Zealand put on by the Institute of Directors over two days for 600 – a summary of every session is here so you can learn from the 55 speakers as well!  For those of you into LinkedIn, the post is here to tag others in – lots of comments on that post too!

The Select Committee has just reported back on the Charities Act Amendments last week over here.  It may surprise some of you that I’m fine with the report and proposed changes as it seems to have been contentious for others.  I do not share the same view that this is a bad thing.  I know many have been calling for a first principles review instead, but my view is this – be careful what you wish for.  There are many positions which are favourable for charities which could be up for consideration such as spiritual groups qualifying as charities and the tax exemptions for companies owned by charities.  A true first principles review would reconsider those matters too.  That is why I am not opposed to the position taken and am glad the Select Committee agreed with some of my – and many others – submissions regarding a tightening of the definition of who is an officer and not requiring a yearly report on reviewing rules.  Let’s move on, and work with the tools we have been given.

 

Am trying to model the reporting on impact that I ask clients to consider providing – in the last 12 months we have assisted around 40 charities to set up, and also helped 8 start-ups raising between 1-2million each.  Diverse areas to be across but our umbrella is purpose and impact which means that we support charities + business across our team of lawyers while also having other specialists among the 80 in our firm such as property, employment, disputes etc.

 

Spinoff recently published my article on Greenwashing and developments on reporting here.

 

This Friday have another “Ask Me Anything” session on Zoom – I need some more questions or sign up here and ask them in person..  You can watch the last one I did over here.  This is an experiment, could be the last one?!

 

Also on Friday another session – our 15th or so – for Incorporated Societies – these are free monthly sessions that go for an hour outlining the top 10 things that will change and you can sign up for this one here.  Lots more info is at our information hub over here including more than 100 FAQs, videos and articles.

 

Director Duties – Select Committee just reported back – last night – on proposed changes to Section 131 here.  In summary, section 131 of the Companies Act sets out a primary duty of Directors, to act in the best interests of the Company.  Dr Duncan Webb MP proposed some clarifications that Directors should consider other factors than shareholder returns, such as the Environment, Employees and the Treaty.  The Select Committee decided to propose change but not go that far, instead advocating for the words to be “To avoid doubt, in considering the best interests of a company or holding company for the purposes of this section, a director may consider matters other than the maximisation of profit.”  Our view is this is a helpful addition – but it is a controversial one as some argue no change is required!  Either way, it shows how increasingly Directors will need to bear in mind more than shareholders, and consider stakeholders as well.  I did a post on this on LinkedIn here.

 

For Seeds am rebranding logo so don’t be surprised if you see this showing up in future!  Exciting times and thanks to Jamie Small at Wordshop and Malin Wahlgren who designed it.

VolunteeringNZ just published a guide to demystifying Legal Language here, co-written with Julie Aitken.

 

On 17th May in the evening in Rolleston will be presenting two sessions – one on good governance, and one on the role of the Board Chair.  Sign ups are here

 

Appreciated ChristchurchNZ giving a shout out to Seeds Podcast over here!

 

Last week presented two hours for Creative HQ in Wellington and their Impact Accelerator on legal structures for impact, IP protection and governance – if you would like the slides let me know as happy to share them.

 

This Tuesday in Christchurch, Thursday in Wellington and next week in Auckland am speaking at the Brightstar event for accountants on these topics:

Avoiding risks, staying safe and supporting your clients: legal advice for accountants

  • Capital raising dos and do nots– key questions you should ask about your money raising options
    • Contracts and the key provisions that you should be aware of
    • Legal structure options – which are best? Companies, Trusts, Incorporated Societies and what this means for your organisation
    • Director Duties: What do you need to know as an accountant in business – and are they changing

 

Flashback to Board Matters, a podcast series with 13 episodes that go for 10-15 minutes on governance and leadership – did you check it out yet?  Boards you know may appreciate it.

These Good Governance Code workshops are coming up across the main centres – these are put on by Community Governance Aotearoa.

 

Have you seen this guide to fundraising by Kate Frykberg?

 

Is TechWeek on your radar?  From 13-20 May lots of free events on here and in Canterbury I’ll be hosting a table next Friday at EPIC from 4pm for a meetups event with Seeds – info is here

 

Recent article on “Funds” and how they work for organisations that do not qualify for tax donee status is over here.  We’ve helped several groups set these up.

 

Seeds podcast now has 346 interviews – one of the latest is with Esha Chhabra, the author of “Working to Restore: Harnessing the Power of Regenerative Business to Heal the World” – it was a great conversation.

 

I just stepped down as chair of the Global Alliance of Impact Lawyers Asia Pacific Board – check out their work in a recent set of articles here.

 

I am not yet talking about it but as a reward since you read this far, am spending a lot of time on planning of the Impact Conference for October.

 

A colleague – Peter – just retired after 48 years working here, so wrote this tribute to him and his influence on many.

His approach was shown last night by the fact that of the literally thousands of clients he has helped over 50 years, he chose to highlight one – a man who had led a difficult life and whose funeral was attended by Peter and only three others (including the funeral director). But Peter shared how he provided legal support to that person at the end of their life to have a will in place. A small story but poignant that of the multimillion dollar corporate deals, property matters, court work that went to the Privy Council etc he chose that, because it emphasised that our role as lawyers is to support people in their times of need and provide access to justice. Sometimes lawyers forget that, and reminders are always welcome.

A few of you received a meeting update a few weeks ago from 2021 from someone else who attended it – apologies for that, I understand from the person who sent it out it was their IT system moving to a new server.

That’s it for now, feel free to forward this on to others who it might help!

Ganbatte kudasai!  Japanese for – do your best.

Steven