• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Parry Field Lawyers
  • Home
  • About
    • Insights
    • Terms of Engagement
    • Testimonials
  • Our People
  • Services
    • Property Law
      • Residential Property
      • Property Construction
      • Commercial Property
        • Property Leasing
      • Subdivisions
      • Community Housing Information Hub
    • Advisory
      • Employment Hub
      • Sale and Purchase
      • Financing
      • Governance
      • Technology/ IT
      • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hub
    • Disputes
      • Court. Tribunals, Arbitrations
      • Estates and Wills
      • Divorce and Separation
      • Insurance
      • Employment Hub
      • Family
      • Company and Shareholding
      • Debt Collection
      • Construction
    • Trusts and Asset Planning
      • Wills and Enduring Powers of Attorney
      • Estates
      • Succession Planning and Asset Protection
      • Trust Management
    • Charities/For Purpose Organisations
      • Charities: Information Hub & Healthchecks
      • Governance Essentials
      • Incorporated Societies: Information Hub
      • Faith Groups: Information Hub
      • Impact Investing: Information Hub
      • Social Enterprises/Impact Companies
      • Start-ups and Capital Raising Hub
      • Schools & Education: Information Hub
    • Immigration and Migrants (移民)
      • Work Visas 工签
      • Family Visas 家庭签证
      • Skilled Migrants 技术移民
      • Business and Investment Visas 生意与投资签证
      • Potentially Prejudicial Information 回复移民局质疑 (PPI)
      • Employer Assistance 雇主协助
      • Overseas Investment 海外投资
  • Resources
    • Guides
    • Articles
    • Case Studies
    • Blog
      • Aotearoa Impact Sector Updates
    • Templates
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Terms and Conditions Including Software
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – One Way
      • Non-Disclosure Agreement – Two Way
      • Independent Contractors Agreement
      • Shareholders’ Resolutions – Written resolution
      • Share Transfer
      • Incorporation – First Shareholder Resolutions
      • Incorporation – First Directors’ Resolutions
    • Videos
      • COVID-19 and Commercial Leases
      • Force Majeure” clauses in Contracts and COVID-19
      • Property sale and purchases and COVID-19
      • Seeds Podcast
  • Careers
    • Careers at Parry Field
    • Current Opportunities
    • Summer Clerk Programme
  • Contact
    • Healthcheck
  • Pay Online
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

The case of CDC and whether it was a charity (or not).

Charities/NFP

Do not pass Go: The case of CDC and whether it was a charity (or not).

 

A fascinating case which came before the courts just a few years ago provides a great lesson and insight in to what makes a “charity”.  Canterbury Development Corporation (CDC) is a great organisation doing a lot of good things in Canterbury and it challenged Charities Services over its decision not to allow CDC to be registered as a charity.  CDC eventually lost the case in the High Court to be registered and have tax exempt status.  This is an interesting case to understand because it is likely that other community focussed groups could also be in the same boat as the CDC. 

CDC helps to promote economic development in the Canterbury region. CDC was therefore arguing that it acted for charitable purposes – specifically the relief of poverty, advancement of education and the beneficial effect to the community (due to the development of industry and commerce).  The case analysed whether CDC could come within one of the four charitable heads contained in the Charities Act 2005 (the only head not argued was that of advancing religion).

The court concluded that CDC was not a charity.  Looking first at education, It decided that this was provided not to a broad section of the public but to a narrow group who met strict eligibility criteria.  The Judge said:

“The objects and work of the CDC are commendable.  Its intention is to help fledgling businesses.  By itself this does not establish CDC as having the necessary focus on charitable intent … These are essentially the provision of help to individual businesses in the hope they will grow.  Not all businesses who ask for or indeed need help are offered it.  Only those within a narrow band.  This help may promote these individual businesses.  It may make them more profitable.  This promotion and profitability is not incidental to the work of CDC.  It is at its core.  This illustrates how the spirit and intendment of charitable purpose is not central to CDC’s function and thereby cannot be charitable.”

Regarding whether CDC promoted the relief of poverty through job creation the judge said:

“What is illustrated by this analysis is that the purpose of the CDC is not relief of poverty through providing those who are unemployed with jobs.  It is to improve the general economic wellbeing of the area.  In that sense, therefore, CDC’s purpose cannot be the relief of poverty.  The possibility of helping someone who is unemployed is too remote for it to qualify as the charitable purpose of relief of poverty.”

Regarding public benefit, the Judge said:

“In CDC… the pursuit of the objects is focused on the development of individual businesses.  The provision of support to those businesses is done in the hope and belief that their economic success would be reflected in the economic wellbeing of the Canterbury region…any public benefit therefore from CDC’s purpose and operations is in my view too remote to establish CDC as a charity. Public benefit is not the primary purpose of CDC’s objects or operation.  It’s primary purpose is the assistance of individual businesses.  The creation of jobs for the unemployed, as opposed to jobs for those who are employed and not in need, is the hoped for, but remote and uncertain, result of the way in which the CDC approaches its task…. The general economic lift for the Canterbury region from CDC’s work is the hoped for result of helping individual businesses.  It is remote from the purpose and operation of CDC. Public benefit is not at the core of CDC’s operation.”

You can read more from the time of the decision here to see how it was portrayed at the time:

This case and the conclusions reached are important for other organisations which may have a broad purpose to assist a region by helping individual businesses in that region.  Just because there is good work being done and there may be positive results it does not mean that the organisation will necessarily be able to register as a charity.  It pays to think about this sooner rather than later if you are at the early stages of forming your charity and we can help work through that process with you.

 

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and you should talk to a lawyer about your specific situation. Reproduction is permitted with prior approval and credit being given back to the source. Contact Steven Moe at stevenmoe@parryfield.com to request this or for any other questions.
Copyright © Parry Field Lawyers 2017.

 

https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/heade6.jpg 282 760 support@happymonday.co.nz https://www.parryfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Parry-Field-Lawyers-Logo.png support@happymonday.co.nz2017-06-18 23:56:492019-08-20 20:16:05The case of CDC and whether it was a charity (or not).

Christchurch CBD

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 60 Cashel Street
Christchurch 8013, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 744
Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

Christchurch

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
1 Rimu Street, Riccarton,
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Rolleston

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480
FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Level 1, 80 Rolleston Drive,
Rolleston, 7614, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 8020, Riccarton,
Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

Hokitika

PHONE: +64 3 755 8673
FAX: +64 3 755 8073

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
127 – 137 Revell Street,
Hokitika 7810, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS:
PO Box 44,
Hokitika 7842, New Zealand

Parry Field Charitable Foundation

Parry Field charitable members of NZ LAw, Global Cross Legal and SCLA

© Copyright – Parry Field Lawyers     |     Privacy Policy

Winding up a Charitable Trust: Key pointsSupporting the Selwyn district
Scroll to top